The Internationalization Of Human Rights And The Importance Of Normative Dialogues Between International And National Courts
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.29248/2236-5788.2017v17i2.p137-149Résumé
This article intends to analyze in the context of the complexity of the process of internationalization of human rights, the definitions and tensions between cultural universalism and relativism, the essence of human rights discourse, its basic norms and an analysis of the normative dialogues in case decisions involving violations of human rights in international tribunals such as the European Court of Human Rights, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and national courts. The well-established dialogue between courts can bring convergences closer together and remove differences of opinion on human rights protection. A new dynamic can occur through a complementarity of one court with respect to the other, even with the different characteristics between the legal orders.
Références
BOBBIO, Norberto. A era dos direitos. 3rd print. Translation by Carlos Nelson Coutinho; Presentation by Celso Lafer. Nova ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2004.
BOGDANDY, A. Von, The European Lesson for International Democracy. The Significance of Articles 9 to 12, EU Treaty for International Organizations, Georgetwon University, 2012.
IACHR. Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Velásquez-Rodríguez vs. Honduras. Ruling of July 21st, 1989.
IACHR. Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Barrios Altos vs. Peru. Ruling of March 14th, 2001.
IACHR. Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Almonacid-Arellano vs. Chile. Ruling of September 26th, 2006.
IACHR. Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Gomes Lund vs. Brazil Ruling of November 24th, 2010.
IACHR. Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Gelman vs. Uruguai. Ruling of February 24th, 2011.
DONNELLY, Jack. International human rights: a regime analysis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1986.
DONNELLY, Jack. Universal human rights in theory and practice. New York: Cornell University Press, 2003.
HENKIN, Louis. Internacional Law: cases and materials. 3 ed. Minnesota: West Publishing , 1993.
IGNATIEFF, Michael. Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
MARTY. The imaginative forces of Law. Chinese Journal of International Law. Oxford University, n. 2, 2003. Disponível em: <http://chinesejil.oxfordjournals.org/content/2/2/623.full. pdf+html>. Acesso em: 08.07.2017.
MARTY, Mireille. Étude juridiques comparatives et internationalisation du droit. Paris: Collège de France/Fayard, 2003.
MARTY. Le relatif et L’universel. Paris: Seuil, 2004.
MARTY, Mireille Delmas. ORDERING PLURALISM: a Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Transnational Legal World, Hart Publishing, 2009.
PIOVESAN, Flávia Piovesan, Tema de Direitos Humanos, 8º edition. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2015.
SANTOS, Boaventura de Sousa. Para uma concepção multicultural dos Direitos Humanos, Lua Nova, nº 39, 1997. Available on: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-64451997000100007. Accessed in: 25.08.2017.
TRUYOL Y SERRA, Antonio. Los derechos humanos, Estudios sobre el Estado de Derecho y la democracia, Trotta, Madrid, 2000.
SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. Global Community of Courts. Harvard International Law Journal. Cambridge, v. 44, nº1, 2003.
