Perspectivas Teóricas, como Basamentos para Estudiar la Gestión Universitaria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2023v12i1.p134-153Palavras-chave:
universidades, teorías organizacionales, gobierno corporativo, dirección universitaria, organizaciones complejasResumo
Gerenciar com sucesso qualquer organização, sempre que representa um grande desafio para as pessoas que assumem posições de liderança, e para isso nas universidades o desafio é ainda maior, uma vez que estas entidades representam a excelência complexidade par. Neste contexto, surge este trabalho, cujo objetivo principal é realizar uma revisão teórica da abordagem da agência, da teoria do servidor e dos grupos de interesse; que pode servir para melhorar a práxis na direção universitária. Para atingir o objetivo definido, os artigos acadêmicos da especialidade são revisados nas principais bases de dados (fontes secundárias de informação). é geralmente inferir-se que em um cenário organizacional "líquido", as abordagens para os fenômenos associados com a gestão universitária deve ser feita a partir da multidimensionalidade dessas instituições de ensino.
Referências
Agle, B., Donaldson, T., Freeman, e., Jensen, M., Mitchell, R., & Wood, D. (2008). Dialogue: Toward Superior Stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2), 153-190. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200818214
Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for "lemons": Quality uncertainty and the market mechanish. The Quartarly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
Anderson, J. (2015). How organization theory supports corporate governance scholarship. Corporate Governance, 15(4), 530-545.
Aslan, H., & Kumar, P. (2014). National governance bundles and corporate agency costs: A cross-country analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(3), 230-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12055
Bammens, Y., Voordeckers, W., & Van-Gils, A. (2011). Boards of directors in family businesses a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 134-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00289.x
Barcellos, L., & Gil, A. M. (2010). Algoritmo Aplicado en el diálogo con los grupos de interés: un estudio de caso en una empresa del sector turismo. Contabilidad y Negocios, 5(10), 76-85.
Recuperado de: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=281621783006
Boden, R., & Rowlands, J. (2022). Paying the piper: the governance of vice-chancellors' remuneration in Australian and UK universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(2), 254-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1841741
Buchanan, J., Chai, D., & Deakin, S. (2014). Agency theory in practice: a qualitative study of hedge fund activism in Japan. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(4), 296-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12047
Caballero, G., García, J., & Quintás, M. (2007). La importancia de los stakeholders de la organización: un análisis empírico aplicado a la empleabilidad del alumnado de la universidad española. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 13(2), 13-32.
Caldwell, C., Ranjan, K., & Vollman, P. (2006). Principal Theory and Principle Theory: Ethical Governance from the follower´s perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(2-3), 207-223.
Disponible en: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25123826
Capra, F. (2003). Las Conexiones ocultas. Barcelona: Anagrama.
Castillo, J. A., Ganga-Contreras, F. A., & Gallegos, A. (2022). Características e incidencia en la gestión de máximos cuerpos colegiados de universidades argentinas: percepciones de expertos. Revista Colombiana de Educación, (86), 119-152.
Chakrabarty, S., & Bass, E. (2014). Corporate governance in microfinance institutions: Board compositions and the ability to face institutional voids. Corporate Governance: an International Review, 22(5), 367-386.
https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12071
Cornforth, C. (2004). The Governance of Cooperatives and mutual associations: a paradox perspective. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 75(1), 11-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2004.00241.x
Cuevas-Rodríguez, G., Gomez-Mejia, L., & Wiseman, R. (2012). Has agency Theory Run its Course? Making the theory more Flexible to Inform the Manegment of Reward Systems. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(6), 526-546. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12004
Davis, J., Allen, M., & Hayes, D. (2010). Is Blood Thicker than Water? a study of Stewardship perceptions in family business. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 34(6), 1093-1116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00415.x
Davis, J., Schoorman, D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Manegement, 22(1), 20-47. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258
Deb, P., & Wiklund, J. (2017). The effects of CEO founder status and stock ownership on entrepreneurial orientation in small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(1), 32-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12231
Donaldson, L., & David, J. (1991). Stewardship theory or Agency theory CEO Governance and Shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49-64. Disponible en: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ausman:v:16:y:1991:i:1:p:49-64
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and complications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/258887
Duque, E. (2009). La gestión de la universidad como elemento básico del sistema universitario: una reflexión desde la perspectiva de los stakeholders. Revista Innovar, Especial en Educación, 25-42.
Durán-Seguel, I., Gallegos, M., Ganga-Contreras, F., & Ahumada, C. (2021). El caso de becas Maule (Chile), decisiones estratégicas: un enfoque desde la responsabilidad social universitaria para el logro de ventajas competitivas. Formación Universitaria, 14(6), 41-50.
Eddleston, K., Kellermanns, F., & Zellweger, T. (2012). Exploring the Entrepreneurial Behavior of family Firms: Does the stewardship Perspective Explain Differences? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 347-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00402.x
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management, 14(4), 432-550. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/258557
Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983a). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325. Disponible en: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-2186%28198306%2926%3A2%3C301%3ASOOAC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-A
Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983b). Agency Problems and Residual Claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/467038
Fassin, Y. (2009). The Stakeldor model refined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 113-135. Disponible en: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40294649
Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Fernández-Izquierdo, M., & Muñoz-Torres, M. (2015). Integrating sustainability into corporate governance: An empirical study on board diversity. Corporate Social Responsability and Environmental Management, 22, 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1333
Filipovic, D., Podrug, N., & Kristo, M. (2010). Assessment of relations between stewardship and stakelholder theory. Annals of Daaam for 2010 & Proceedings of theinternational Daaam Symposium (págs. 1229-1231). Vienna: Daaam International.
Fossatti, P., & Danesi, L. C. (2018). Universidades Comunitarias en Brasil: ¿Por qué hay que Perfeccionar su Modelo de Gestión? Formación universitaria, 11(5), 75-84. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062018000500075
Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freeman, E. (2010). Managing for stakeholders: Trade-offs or value creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(1), 7-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0935-5
Freeman, E., Wicks, A., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stkeholder theory and "the corporate objetive revisited". Organization Science, 15(3), 364-369. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0066
Ganga-Contreras, F. (2005). Análisis preliminar del gobierno universitario chileno. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 10(30), 213-246.
Ganga-Contreras, F. A., Suárez-Amaya, W., Calderón, A-I., Wandersil, M., & Jung, H. S. (2019). Retos a la gobernanza universitaria: Acotaciones sobre la cuestión de la autoridad y la profesionalización de la gestión de las universidades. Fronteiras, 8(3), 435-456.
Ganga-Contreras, F., Quiroz, J., & Fossati, P. (2017). Análisis sincrónico de la gobernanza universitaria: una mirada teórica a los años sesenta y setenta. Educación y Pesquisa, 43(2), 553-568. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-9702201608135289
Ganga-Contreras, F., Ramos, M., Leal, A., & Valdivieso, P. (2015). Teoría de Agencia (TA): Supuestos teóricos aplicables a la gestión universitaria. Revista Innovar, 25(57), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v25n57.50324
Gómez, L. (2008). Información Asimétrica: Selección Adversa y Riesgo Moral. Actualidad Empresarial-Informe Financiero, (170), 1-4.
Guzman, A., & Trujillo, M. (2011). Politicas de incentivos relacionadas con la investigación: una revisión crítica desde la teoría de contrato. Estudios Gerenciales, 27(120), 127-145. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=21222706007
Heaton, S., Teece, D., & Agronin, E. (2023). Dynamic capabilities and governance: An empirical investigation of financial performance of the higher education sector. Strategic Management Journal, 44(2), 520-548. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3444
Henssen, B., Voordeckers, W., Lambrechts, F., & Koiranen, M. (2014). The CEO autonomy-stewardship behavior relationship in family firms: The mediating role of Psychological ownership. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(3), 312-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.012
Hill, C., & Jones, T. (1992). Stakeholder - Agency Theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00657.x
Holmstrom, B. (1979). Moral Hazard and observality. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 74-91.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3003320
Huerta-Riveros, P. C., Gaete-Feres, H. G., & Pedraja-Rejas, L. M. (2020). Dirección estratégica, sistema de información y calidad. El caso de una universidad estatal chilena. Información Tecnológica, 31(2), 253-266. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642020000200253
Huerta-Riveros, P., Gaete-Feres, H., Yáñez-Alvarado, M., Pedraja-Rejas, L., & Leyton-Pavez, C. (2022). Experiencia en la implementación de un modelo de dirección estratégica en educación superior. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación, 21(46), 261-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.21703/0718-5162.v21.n46.2022.014
Jensen, M., & Meckling, N. (1976). Theory of the Firma: managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial of Economics, 3, 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Jones, T., Felps, W., & Bigley, G. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholders-related decisions: The role of stakeholders culture. The Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 137-155.
Kao, L., Chiou, J.-R., & Chen, A. (2004). The agency problems, firm perfomance and monitoring mechanisms: the evidence from collateralised shares in Taiwan. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 389-402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00380.x
Kevistö, J. (2008). An Assessment of agency Theory as a Framework for the government university relationship. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 30(4), 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800802383018
Kivistö, J. (2007). Agency Theory as a framework for the government- university relationship. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
Knapp, J., Dalziel, T., & Lewis, M. (2011). Governing top managers: Board control, social categorization, and their unintended influence on discretionary behaviors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(4), 295-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00845.x
Lu, Y., & Abeysekera, I. (2017). What do stakeholders care about? investigating corporate social and environmental disclosure in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(1), 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2844-5
Marvel, M., & Marvel, H. (2008). Government-to-Government contrating: stewardship, agency, and subsitution. International Public Management Journal, 11(2), 171-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490802095870
Middlehurst, R. (2004). Changing internal governance: A discussion of leadership roles and management structures in UK universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(4), 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2004.00273.x
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1993). Economía, organización y gestión de la empresa. Barcelona: Ariel S.A.
Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/259247
Mitchell, R., Agle, B., Chrisman, J., & Spence, L. (2011). Toward a theory of Stakeholder salience in family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 235-255. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201121215
Pedraja-Rejas, L., Rodríguez-Ponce, E., & Muñoz-Fritis, C. (2022). Human resource management and performance in Ibero-America: Bibliometric analysis of scientific production. Cuadernos de Gestión, 22, 123-137. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.211569lp
Pérez-Calero, L., Sánchez, Guerrero-Villegas, J., & Hurtado González, J. M. (2017) The influence of organizational factors on board roles, Management Decision, 55(5), 842-871. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2015-0566
Perrault, E. (2014). Zombies and originals: How cultural theory informs stakeholder management. Business and Society Review, 119(4), 447-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12041
Pineda, P., & Celis, J. (2017). ¿Hacia la Universidad Corporativa? Reformas Basadas en el Mercado e Isomorfismo Institucional en Colombia. Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 25(71), 1-32. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=275050047113
Portalanza, A. (2013). Gobierno Corporativo; Una Aproximación Teórica. Saber, Ciencia y Libertad, 8(1), 117-124. https://doi.org/10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2013v8n1.1888
Pouryousefi, S., & Frooman, J. (2017). The Problem of Unilateralism in Agency Theory: Towards a Bilateral Formulation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27(2), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.77
Produg, N., Filipovic, D., & Kristo, M. (2010). Critical Overview of Agency Theory. Annals of Daaam for 2010 & proceedings of the international Daaam symposium (págs. 1227-1229). Vienna: Daaam International.
Pucheta-Martinez, M., Bel-Oms, I., & Olcina-Sempere, G. (2016). Corporate Governance, female directors and quality of financial information. Business Ethics: A European review, 25(4), 363-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12123
Rodríguez-Ponce, E., & Pedraja-Rejas, L. (2015). Estudio exploratorio de la relación entre gestión académica y calidad en las instituciones universitarias. Revista Interciencia, 40(10), 656-663. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33941643002
Schiehll, E., & Castrop-Martins, H. (2016). Cross-National Governance Research: A systematic review and assessment. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12158
Schlange, L. (2009). Stakeholder Identification in sustainability entrepreneurship: The rol of managerial and organisational cognition. Greener Management International, 55, 13-32.
Schnackenberg, A., & Tomlinson, E. (2016). Organizational transparency: A new perspective on managing trust in organization-stakeholder relationships. Journal of Management, 42, 1784-1810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314525202
Siebels, J., & Knyphausen-aufseb, D. (2012). A review of theory in family business research: The implications for corporate governance. International Journal Manegement Reviews, 14, 280-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00317.x
Silva, B., Azúa, D., Díaz, P., & Pizarro, V. (2008). Influencias de los Inversionistas Institucionales en la Transparencia del Mercado de Capitales Chileno. Academia, Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 40, 54-67.
Smallman, C. (2004). Exploring theoretical paradigms it corporate governance. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(1), 78-94. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2004.004898
Smith, M., Zsidisin, G., & Adams, L. (2005). An Agency Theory perspective on student perfomance evaluation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovate Education, 3(1), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2005.00051.x
Stiglitz, J. (1989). Principal and agent. En J. Eatwel, M. Murray, & P. Newman, The new Palgrave: allocation, information and markts (págs. 241-253). London: Mcmillan.
Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
Swain, K. R., & Chaudhury, S. K. (2021). Corporate Governance and Agency Theory: A Bibliometric Review. Pacific Business Review International, 13(11), 110-119. Recuperado de: http://www.pbr.co.in/2021/2021_month/May/11.pdf
Vallejo, c., & Puentes, R. (2014). Family firms as incubators for ethical behavior: An exploratory analysis. Journal of management & organization, 20(6), 784-807.https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2014.55
Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. (2012). The transaction cost economics theory of the family firm: Family-based human asset specificity and the bifurcation bias. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1183-1205.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00545.x
Walters, B., Le, S., & Kroll, M. (2015). Post-IPO governance and top management team rent generation and appropriation. Journal of business research, 68(1), 47-55.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.05.009
Wardhani, R. S., Taufiq, Fuadah, L. L., Siddik, S., Awaluddin, M., & Hadjri, M. I. (2019). Good university goverance: Budgeting participation and internal control. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 14(1), 1-17
Willer, D., Lovaglia, M., & Markovsky, B. (1997). Power and Influence: A theoretical bridge. Social Forces, 76(2), 571-603.Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2580725
Wiseman, R., Cuevas-Rodriguez, G., & Gomez-Mejia, L. (2012). Towards a Social Theory. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 202-222.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01016.x
Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for "lemons": Quality uncertainty and the market mechanish. The Quartarly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
Anderson, J. (2015). How organization theory supports corporate governance scholarship. Corporate Governance, 15(4), 530-545.
Aslan, H., & Kumar, P. (2014). National governance bundles and corporate agency costs: A cross-country analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(3), 230-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12055
Bammens, Y., Voordeckers, W., & Van-Gils, A. (2011). Boards of directors in family businesses a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 134-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00289.x
Barcellos, L., & Gil, A. M. (2010). Algoritmo Aplicado en el diálogo con los grupos de interés: un estudio de caso en una empresa del sector turismo. Contabilidad y Negocios, 5(10), 76-85.
Recuperado de: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=281621783006
Boden, R., & Rowlands, J. (2022). Paying the piper: the governance of vice-chancellors' remuneration in Australian and UK universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(2), 254-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1841741
Buchanan, J., Chai, D., & Deakin, S. (2014). Agency theory in practice: a qualitative study of hedge fund activism in Japan. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(4), 296-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12047
Caballero, G., García, J., & Quintás, M. (2007). La importancia de los stakeholders de la organización: un análisis empírico aplicado a la empleabilidad del alumnado de la universidad española. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 13(2), 13-32.
Caldwell, C., Ranjan, K., & Vollman, P. (2006). Principal Theory and Principle Theory: Ethical Governance from the follower´s perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(2-3), 207-223.
Disponible en: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25123826
Capra, F. (2003). Las Conexiones ocultas. Barcelona: Anagrama.
Castillo, J. A., Ganga-Contreras, F. A., & Gallegos, A. (2022). Características e incidencia en la gestión de máximos cuerpos colegiados de universidades argentinas: percepciones de expertos. Revista Colombiana de Educación, (86), 119-152.
Chakrabarty, S., & Bass, E. (2014). Corporate governance in microfinance institutions: Board compositions and the ability to face institutional voids. Corporate Governance: an International Review, 22(5), 367-386.
https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12071
Cornforth, C. (2004). The Governance of Cooperatives and mutual associations: a paradox perspective. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 75(1), 11-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2004.00241.x
Cuevas-Rodríguez, G., Gomez-Mejia, L., & Wiseman, R. (2012). Has agency Theory Run its Course? Making the theory more Flexible to Inform the Manegment of Reward Systems. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(6), 526-546. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12004
Davis, J., Allen, M., & Hayes, D. (2010). Is Blood Thicker than Water? a study of Stewardship perceptions in family business. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 34(6), 1093-1116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00415.x
Davis, J., Schoorman, D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Manegement, 22(1), 20-47. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258
Deb, P., & Wiklund, J. (2017). The effects of CEO founder status and stock ownership on entrepreneurial orientation in small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(1), 32-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12231
Donaldson, L., & David, J. (1991). Stewardship theory or Agency theory CEO Governance and Shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49-64. Disponible en: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ausman:v:16:y:1991:i:1:p:49-64
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and complications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/258887
Duque, E. (2009). La gestión de la universidad como elemento básico del sistema universitario: una reflexión desde la perspectiva de los stakeholders. Revista Innovar, Especial en Educación, 25-42.
Durán-Seguel, I., Gallegos, M., Ganga-Contreras, F., & Ahumada, C. (2021). El caso de becas Maule (Chile), decisiones estratégicas: un enfoque desde la responsabilidad social universitaria para el logro de ventajas competitivas. Formación Universitaria, 14(6), 41-50.
Eddleston, K., Kellermanns, F., & Zellweger, T. (2012). Exploring the Entrepreneurial Behavior of family Firms: Does the stewardship Perspective Explain Differences? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 347-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00402.x
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management, 14(4), 432-550. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/258557
Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983a). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325. Disponible en: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-2186%28198306%2926%3A2%3C301%3ASOOAC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-A
Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983b). Agency Problems and Residual Claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/467038
Fassin, Y. (2009). The Stakeldor model refined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 113-135. Disponible en: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40294649
Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Fernández-Izquierdo, M., & Muñoz-Torres, M. (2015). Integrating sustainability into corporate governance: An empirical study on board diversity. Corporate Social Responsability and Environmental Management, 22, 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1333
Filipovic, D., Podrug, N., & Kristo, M. (2010). Assessment of relations between stewardship and stakelholder theory. Annals of Daaam for 2010 & Proceedings of theinternational Daaam Symposium (págs. 1229-1231). Vienna: Daaam International.
Fossatti, P., & Danesi, L. C. (2018). Universidades Comunitarias en Brasil: ¿Por qué hay que Perfeccionar su Modelo de Gestión? Formación universitaria, 11(5), 75-84. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062018000500075
Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freeman, E. (2010). Managing for stakeholders: Trade-offs or value creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(1), 7-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0935-5
Freeman, E., Wicks, A., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stkeholder theory and "the corporate objetive revisited". Organization Science, 15(3), 364-369. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0066
Ganga-Contreras, F. (2005). Análisis preliminar del gobierno universitario chileno. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 10(30), 213-246.
Ganga-Contreras, F. A., Suárez-Amaya, W., Calderón, A-I., Wandersil, M., & Jung, H. S. (2019). Retos a la gobernanza universitaria: Acotaciones sobre la cuestión de la autoridad y la profesionalización de la gestión de las universidades. Fronteiras, 8(3), 435-456.
Ganga-Contreras, F., Quiroz, J., & Fossati, P. (2017). Análisis sincrónico de la gobernanza universitaria: una mirada teórica a los años sesenta y setenta. Educación y Pesquisa, 43(2), 553-568. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-9702201608135289
Ganga-Contreras, F., Ramos, M., Leal, A., & Valdivieso, P. (2015). Teoría de Agencia (TA): Supuestos teóricos aplicables a la gestión universitaria. Revista Innovar, 25(57), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v25n57.50324
Gómez, L. (2008). Información Asimétrica: Selección Adversa y Riesgo Moral. Actualidad Empresarial-Informe Financiero, (170), 1-4.
Guzman, A., & Trujillo, M. (2011). Politicas de incentivos relacionadas con la investigación: una revisión crítica desde la teoría de contrato. Estudios Gerenciales, 27(120), 127-145. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=21222706007
Heaton, S., Teece, D., & Agronin, E. (2023). Dynamic capabilities and governance: An empirical investigation of financial performance of the higher education sector. Strategic Management Journal, 44(2), 520-548. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3444
Henssen, B., Voordeckers, W., Lambrechts, F., & Koiranen, M. (2014). The CEO autonomy-stewardship behavior relationship in family firms: The mediating role of Psychological ownership. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(3), 312-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.012
Hill, C., & Jones, T. (1992). Stakeholder - Agency Theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00657.x
Holmstrom, B. (1979). Moral Hazard and observality. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 74-91.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3003320
Huerta-Riveros, P. C., Gaete-Feres, H. G., & Pedraja-Rejas, L. M. (2020). Dirección estratégica, sistema de información y calidad. El caso de una universidad estatal chilena. Información Tecnológica, 31(2), 253-266. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642020000200253
Huerta-Riveros, P., Gaete-Feres, H., Yáñez-Alvarado, M., Pedraja-Rejas, L., & Leyton-Pavez, C. (2022). Experiencia en la implementación de un modelo de dirección estratégica en educación superior. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación, 21(46), 261-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.21703/0718-5162.v21.n46.2022.014
Jensen, M., & Meckling, N. (1976). Theory of the Firma: managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial of Economics, 3, 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Jones, T., Felps, W., & Bigley, G. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholders-related decisions: The role of stakeholders culture. The Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 137-155.
Kao, L., Chiou, J.-R., & Chen, A. (2004). The agency problems, firm perfomance and monitoring mechanisms: the evidence from collateralised shares in Taiwan. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 389-402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00380.x
Kevistö, J. (2008). An Assessment of agency Theory as a Framework for the government university relationship. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 30(4), 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800802383018
Kivistö, J. (2007). Agency Theory as a framework for the government- university relationship. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
Knapp, J., Dalziel, T., & Lewis, M. (2011). Governing top managers: Board control, social categorization, and their unintended influence on discretionary behaviors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(4), 295-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00845.x
Lu, Y., & Abeysekera, I. (2017). What do stakeholders care about? investigating corporate social and environmental disclosure in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(1), 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2844-5
Marvel, M., & Marvel, H. (2008). Government-to-Government contrating: stewardship, agency, and subsitution. International Public Management Journal, 11(2), 171-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490802095870
Middlehurst, R. (2004). Changing internal governance: A discussion of leadership roles and management structures in UK universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(4), 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2004.00273.x
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1993). Economía, organización y gestión de la empresa. Barcelona: Ariel S.A.
Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/259247
Mitchell, R., Agle, B., Chrisman, J., & Spence, L. (2011). Toward a theory of Stakeholder salience in family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 235-255. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201121215
Pedraja-Rejas, L., Rodríguez-Ponce, E., & Muñoz-Fritis, C. (2022). Human resource management and performance in Ibero-America: Bibliometric analysis of scientific production. Cuadernos de Gestión, 22, 123-137. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.211569lp
Pérez-Calero, L., Sánchez, Guerrero-Villegas, J., & Hurtado González, J. M. (2017) The influence of organizational factors on board roles, Management Decision, 55(5), 842-871. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2015-0566
Perrault, E. (2014). Zombies and originals: How cultural theory informs stakeholder management. Business and Society Review, 119(4), 447-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12041
Pineda, P., & Celis, J. (2017). ¿Hacia la Universidad Corporativa? Reformas Basadas en el Mercado e Isomorfismo Institucional en Colombia. Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 25(71), 1-32. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=275050047113
Portalanza, A. (2013). Gobierno Corporativo; Una Aproximación Teórica. Saber, Ciencia y Libertad, 8(1), 117-124. https://doi.org/10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2013v8n1.1888
Pouryousefi, S., & Frooman, J. (2017). The Problem of Unilateralism in Agency Theory: Towards a Bilateral Formulation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27(2), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.77
Produg, N., Filipovic, D., & Kristo, M. (2010). Critical Overview of Agency Theory. Annals of Daaam for 2010 & proceedings of the international Daaam symposium (págs. 1227-1229). Vienna: Daaam International.
Pucheta-Martinez, M., Bel-Oms, I., & Olcina-Sempere, G. (2016). Corporate Governance, female directors and quality of financial information. Business Ethics: A European review, 25(4), 363-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12123
Rodríguez-Ponce, E., & Pedraja-Rejas, L. (2015). Estudio exploratorio de la relación entre gestión académica y calidad en las instituciones universitarias. Revista Interciencia, 40(10), 656-663. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33941643002
Schiehll, E., & Castrop-Martins, H. (2016). Cross-National Governance Research: A systematic review and assessment. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12158
Schlange, L. (2009). Stakeholder Identification in sustainability entrepreneurship: The rol of managerial and organisational cognition. Greener Management International, 55, 13-32.
Schnackenberg, A., & Tomlinson, E. (2016). Organizational transparency: A new perspective on managing trust in organization-stakeholder relationships. Journal of Management, 42, 1784-1810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314525202
Siebels, J., & Knyphausen-aufseb, D. (2012). A review of theory in family business research: The implications for corporate governance. International Journal Manegement Reviews, 14, 280-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00317.x
Silva, B., Azúa, D., Díaz, P., & Pizarro, V. (2008). Influencias de los Inversionistas Institucionales en la Transparencia del Mercado de Capitales Chileno. Academia, Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 40, 54-67.
Smallman, C. (2004). Exploring theoretical paradigms it corporate governance. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(1), 78-94. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2004.004898
Smith, M., Zsidisin, G., & Adams, L. (2005). An Agency Theory perspective on student perfomance evaluation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovate Education, 3(1), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2005.00051.x
Stiglitz, J. (1989). Principal and agent. En J. Eatwel, M. Murray, & P. Newman, The new Palgrave: allocation, information and markts (págs. 241-253). London: Mcmillan.
Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
Swain, K. R., & Chaudhury, S. K. (2021). Corporate Governance and Agency Theory: A Bibliometric Review. Pacific Business Review International, 13(11), 110-119. Recuperado de: http://www.pbr.co.in/2021/2021_month/May/11.pdf
Vallejo, c., & Puentes, R. (2014). Family firms as incubators for ethical behavior: An exploratory analysis. Journal of management & organization, 20(6), 784-807.https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2014.55
Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. (2012). The transaction cost economics theory of the family firm: Family-based human asset specificity and the bifurcation bias. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1183-1205.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00545.x
Walters, B., Le, S., & Kroll, M. (2015). Post-IPO governance and top management team rent generation and appropriation. Journal of business research, 68(1), 47-55.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.05.009
Wardhani, R. S., Taufiq, Fuadah, L. L., Siddik, S., Awaluddin, M., & Hadjri, M. I. (2019). Good university goverance: Budgeting participation and internal control. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 14(1), 1-17
Willer, D., Lovaglia, M., & Markovsky, B. (1997). Power and Influence: A theoretical bridge. Social Forces, 76(2), 571-603.Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2580725
Wiseman, R., Cuevas-Rodriguez, G., & Gomez-Mejia, L. (2012). Towards a Social Theory. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 202-222.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01016.x
Downloads
Publicado
2023-04-28
Como Citar
GANGA-CONTRERAS, Francisco Anibal; ABELLO, Juan; PEDRAJA-REJAS, Liliana; DURÁN, Ivette; CASTILLO, Juan. Perspectivas Teóricas, como Basamentos para Estudiar la Gestión Universitaria. Fronteira: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, [S. l.], v. 12, n. 1, p. 134–153, 2023. DOI: 10.21664/2238-8869.2023v12i1.p134-153. Disponível em: https://revistas.unievangelica.edu.br/index.php/fronteiras/article/view/6565. Acesso em: 22 dez. 2024.
Edição
Seção
Artigos
Licença
Esta revista oferece acesso livre imediato ao seu conteúdo, seguindo o princípio de que disponibilizar gratuitamente o conhecimento científico ao público proporciona maior democratização mundial do conhecimento.
A partir da publicação realizada na revista os autores possuem copyright e direitos de publicação de seus artigos sem restrições.
A Revista Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science segue os preceitos legais da licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional. 
