Biodiversidade na Amazônia Brasileira: Prospecção Científica e Tecnológica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2025v14i2.p225-245Palabras clave:
conhecimento científico, desenvolvimento sustentável, InovaçãoResumen
A Amazônia Brasileira figura como uma das maiores áreas ecológicas do mundo, cuja riqueza de biodiversidade animal e vegetal oportuniza significativos contributos no âmbito dos serviços ecossistêmicos. Contudo, historicamente a região vem sendo ameaçada por desmatamento acelerado e demais atividades antrópicas. Nesse sentido, emerge a pertinência de estudos de prospecção científica e tecnológica a fim de proporcionar direcionamento de esforços e investimentos orientados à sua preservação. Ante ao exposto, a pesquisa realizada teve como objetivo caracterizar as publicações científicas e as patentes de invenção que versam sobre biodiversidade e Amazônia Brasileira, de maneira conjunta. Para tanto, realizou-se uma investigação quantitativa e descritiva operacionalizada por meio de uma análise bibliométrica na base de dados Web of Science e de um estudo de prospecção tecnológica na base PatentScope. O portfólio obtido totalizou 683 artigos científicos ao passo que o conjunto de patentes de invenção foi composto por 166 registros. Os resultados demonstraram que as pesquisas sob o referido escopo podem ser divididas em três clusters, quais sejam: (i) mecanismos de proteção ambiental; (ii) biodiversidade de flora, e; (iii) biodiversidade de fauna. Por sua vez, o mapeamento tecnológico enfatizou a contemporaneidade do tema e as potencialidades de avanços tecnológicos sustentáveis na Amazônia os quais são fortemente legitimados pelas causalidades ambientais. Dessa forma, as contribuições da pesquisa respaldam-se na exploração dos avanços sobre biodiversidade na Amazônia Brasileira sob a perspectiva de desenvolvimento científico e tecnológico, contemplando dois indicadores centrais de progresso de determinada área. Logo, os achados obtidos podem orientar o desenvolvimento e a implementação de estratégias, bem como a consolidação de políticas públicas orientadas à cenários futuros.
Citas
Abbas A, et al. 2014.A literature review on the state-of-the-art in patent analysis. World Pat Inf 37:3-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2013.12.006
Alvarado RU 2016. Growth of literature on Bradford's law. Investigación Bibliotecológica: Archivonomía, Bibliotecología e Información 30(68):51-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibbai.2016.06.003
Álvares S 2016. A Ciência fala inglês? Em tempos de mudança. Nascer e Crescer: Revista de Pediatria do Centro Hospitalar do Porto 25(3):133-135.
Amparo KKS, Ribeiro MCO, Guarieiro LLN 2012. Estudo de caso utilizando mapeamento de prospecção tecnológica como principal ferramenta de busca científica. Perspect Ciênc Inf 17(4):195-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-99362012000400012
Arruda H et al. 2022. VOSviewer and bibliometrix. J Med Libr Assoc 110(3):392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1434
Azevedo-Ramos C, Galatti U 2002. Patterns of amphibian diversity in Brazilian Amazonia: conservation implications. Biol Conserv 103(1):103-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00129-X
Baas J et al. 2020. Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quant Sci Stud 1(1):377-386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
Backer JCA, Spracklen DV 2019. Climate benefits of intact Amazon forests and the biophysical consequences of disturbance. Front For Glob Change 2:47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2019.00047
Barros FB et al. 2012. Medicinal use of fauna by a traditional community in the Brazilian Amazonia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 8:1-20.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-8-37
Battisti DS, Naylor RL 2009. Historical Warnings of Future Food Insecurity with Unprecedented Seasonal Heat. Science 323(5911):240-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164363
Bhattacharya N 2019. The Amazon in peril: The life and death of the world's most diverse biome. Chicago Policy Review.
Boerner J, Mendoza A, Vosti AS 2007. Ecosystem Services, Agriculture, And Rural Poverty In The Eastern Brazilian Amazon: Interrelationships And Policy Prescriptions. Ecolog Econom 64(2):356-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.001
Borgman CL, Furner J 2002. Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Ann R Med Inf Sci Tech 36(1):1-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440360102
Bornmann L, Leydesdorff L 2014. Scientometrics in a changing research landscape: bibliometrics has become an integral part of research quality evaluation and has been changing the practice of research. EMBO Reports 15(12):1228-1232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201439608
Bradford SC 1934. Note on the Scattering of Papers on Specific Subjects in Scientific Periodicals. Proc Brit Soc Int Bib 5(3):74-75.
Brasil. Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial: IPC/CPC. 20 de abril de 2015. Disponível em: <https://www.gov.br/inpi/pt-br/servicos/patentes/classificacao>.
Browder JO 1988. Public policy and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Public policies and the misuse of forest resources. In: Repetto, R.; Gillis, M. (Eds.). Public policies and the misuse of forest resources. London, Cambridge University Press, p. 247-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511601125.007
Bueno C et al. 2021. Redes e fronteiras tecnológicas em instituição de pesquisa: há um caminho sendo construído para o desenvolvimento rural da bioeconomia? CC&T 38(1):e26776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35977/0104-1096.cct2021.v1.26776
Cesaroni F, Baglieri D 2012. Technology intelligence: New challenges from patent information. Inf Syst: Crossroads for Organization, Management, Accounting and Engineering 267-274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2789-7_30
Codeço CT et al. 2021. Epidemiology, biodiversity, and technological trajectories in the Brazilian Amazon: from malaria to COVID-19. Front in Public Health 9:647754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.647754
Coutinho M 2004.Technological evaluation of biotechnology capability in Amazon institutions. Comisión Económica para América Latina y e Caribe, ECLAC.
Czech B 2008. Prospects for reconciling the conflict between economic growth and biodiversity conservation with technological progress. Conserv Biol 22(6):1389-1398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01089.x
Da Ponte E et al. 2015. Tropical forest cover dynamics for Latin America using Earth observation data: a review covering the continental, regional, and local scale. Int J Remote Sens 36(12), 3196-3242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2015.1058539
Donthu N et al. 2021. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J Bus Res 133:285-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Drubin DG, Kellogg DR 2012. English as the universal language of science: opportunities and challenges. Molecular Biology of the Cell 23(8):1399-1399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e12-02-0108
Ellwanger JH et al. 2020. Beyond diversity loss and climate change: Impacts of Amazon deforestation on infectious diseases and public health. An Acad Bras Ciênc 92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202020191375
Fairthorne RA 1969. Content analysis, specification, and control. Ann R Med Inf Sci Tech 4:73-109.
Fearnside PM 1996. Amazonian deforestation and global warming: carbon stocks in vegetation replacing Brazil's Amazon forest. For Ecol Manag 80(1-3):21-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(95)03647-4
Feldmann PR 2021. África e América do Sul: O futuro passa pela biodiversidade. Estud Av 35:111-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-4014.2021.35102.007
Figueiredo AD 2001. Escrever um artigo científico: das partes para o todo. VIII SEMINF-PA 01-03.
França FM et al. 2020. Climatic and local stressor interactions threaten tropical forests and coral reefs. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 375(1794):20190116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0116
Garfield E 2006. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA 295(1):90-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.1.90
Gentry AH 1992. Tropical forest biodiversity: distributional patterns and their conservational significance. Oikos 19-28.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3545512
Grames EM et al. 2019. An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks. Methods Ecol Evo 10(10):1645-1654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13268
Guerra A et al. 2020. Ecological restoration in Brazilian biomes: Identifying advances and gaps. For Ecol Manag 458:117802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117802
Heckenberger MJ et al. 2007. The legacy of cultural landscapes in the Brazilian Amazon: implications for biodiversity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 362(1478):197-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1979
Jaffe AB 1986. Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: evidence from Firm's Patents, Profits, and Market Value. AER 76(5):984-1001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w1815
Korom P 2019. A bibliometric visualization of the economics and sociology of wealth inequality: a world part. Scientometrics 1:1-20.
Kushairi N, Ahmi A 2021. Flipped classroom in the second decade of the Millenia: a Bibliometrics analysis with Lotka's law. Educ Inf Technol 26(4):4401-4431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10457-8
Lapola DM et al. 2023. The drivers and impacts of Amazon forest degradation. Science 379(6630):eabp8622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abp8622
Lawani SM 1982. Bibliometrics: Its theoretical foundations, methods and applications. Libri 31:294-315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.1981.31.1.294
Lawson C 2010. Biodiversity Conservation Access and Benefit-Sharing Contracts and Patents. Available at SSRN 1612552, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1612552
Leydesdorff L 2006. Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal‐journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports? JASIST 57(5):601-613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20322
Leydesdorff L et al. 2014. Interactive overlay maps for US patent (USPTO) data based on International Patent Classification (IPC). Scientometrics 98:1583-1599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0923-2
Li K et al. 2018. Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997-2017: A selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis. Scientometrics 115(1):1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2622-5
Linhares AMF et al. 2018.Technological prospection on membranes containing silver nanoparticles for water disinfection. Recent Pat Nanotech 12(1):3-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1872210511666170920144342
List J. 2012. Review of machine translation in patents - Implications for search. World Pat Inf 34(3):193-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2012.05.005
Lobo DA, Barwaldt R 2023. Representação temática de estudos sobre educação em ciências: Interpretações possíveis a partir das palavras-chave e da Lei de Zipf. Momento-Diálogos em Educação 32(1):188-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/momento.v32i01.14051
López-Illescas C et al. 2008. Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus. JOI 2(4):304-316.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.08.001
Lotka AJ 1926. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. J Wash Acad Sci 16(12):317-323.
Machado Júnior CM et al. 2016. The laws of bibliometrics in different scientific databases. RCA 18(44):111-123.
MCTI 2024. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovações. Patentes: nota metodológica. Disponível em <https://antigo.mctic.gov.br/mctic/opencms/indicadores/detalhe/Notas_Metodologicas/Patentes.html
Milheiras SG, Mace GM 2019. Assessing ecosystem service provision in a tropical region with high forest cover: Spatial overlap and the impact of land use change in Amapá, Brazil. Ecol Indic 99:12-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.013
Mu Y, Jones C 2022. An observational analysis of precipitation and deforestation age in the Brazilian Legal Amazon. Atmos. Res 271:106122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106122
Nascimento MGP 2021. Mapeamento científico e tecnológico de espécies de manguezal. Rev Humanid Inov 8(50):41-55.
Nepstad DC et al. 2008. Interactions among Amazon land use, forests and climate: prospects for a near-term forest tipping point. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci 363(1498):1737-1746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.0036
Nunes CA et al. 2022. Linking land-use and land-cover transitions to their ecological impact in the Amazon. Proc Natl Acad Sci 119(27): e2202310119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202310119
OECD 2005. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Oslo Manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. 3. ed. Paris, OECD EUROSTAT.
Oliveira RC, Marques TR 2014. Patentes de invenção e a EMBRAPA: dúvidas frequentes, esclarecimentos sobre leis e normas. Brasília, EMBRAPA.
Ometto JP, Aguiar APD, Martinelli LA 2011. Amazon deforestation in Brazil: effects, drivers and challenges. Carbon Manag 2(5):575-585.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.11.48
OVTT 2024. Observatório tecnológico. Resources - Patentscope: worldwide patent database. Disponível em: < https://www.ovtt.org/en/resources/patentscope-patent-database/>.
Pan Y et al. 2011. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests. Science 333:988-993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201609
Papageorgiadis N, Sofka W 2020. Patent enforcement across 51 countries-Patent enforcement index 1998-2017. J World Bus 55(4):101092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101092
Peres CA et al. 2010. Biodiversity conservation in human-modified Amazonian forest landscapes. Biol Conserv 143(10):2314-2327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.01.021
Pimentel VP et al. 2015. Biodiversidade brasileira como fonte da inovação farmacêutica: uma nova esperança?. Revista do BNDES 43:41-89.
Popp D et al. 2010. Energy, the environment, and technological change. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation 2:873-937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)02005-8
Pranckutė R 2021. Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today's academic world. Publications 9(1):12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
Ritter CD et al. 2017. Environmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: Challenges and prospects to assess biodiversity. Biol Conserv 206:161-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.031
Rödig E et al. 2018. The importance of forest structure for carbon fluxes of the Amazon rainforest. ERL 13(5): 054013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabc61
Rosa C et al. 2021. The Program for Biodiversity Research in Brazil: The role of regional networks for biodiversity knowledge, dissemination, and conservation. An Acad Bras Ciênc 93:e20201604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120201604
Rousseau B, Rousseau R 2000. Percolation as a model for informetric distributions: fragment size distribution characterized by Bradford curves". Scientometrics 47:195-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005678707987
Salinas-Ríos K, García López AJ 2022. Bibliometrics, a useful tool within the field of research. J B App Psyc Res 3(6):9-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29057/jbapr.v3i6.6829
Santos CV et al. 2023. The Brazilian Atlantic Forest genetic resources in patents and the challenges to control the economic use of biodiversity. World Pat Inf 74:102218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2023.102218
Schumpeter JA 1936. The theory of economic development. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Serra FAR, Ferreira MASPV 2014. O título, resumo e palavras-chave dos artigos. Rev Ibero-Am Estratég 13(4):1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v13i4.2179
Shelton RD, Leydesdorff L 2012. Publish or Patent: bibliometric evidence for empirical trade-offs in national funding strategies. JASIST 63(3):498-511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21677
Silva RFB et al. 2023. Balancing food production with climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation in the Brazilian Amazon. Sci Total Environt 904:166681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166681
Simmonds MSJ et al. 2020. Biodiversity and patents: Overview of plants and fungi covered by patents. Plants, People, Planet 2(5):546-556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10144
Stegmann LF et al. 2024. Brazilian public funding for biodiversity research in the Amazon. Perspect Ecol Conserv 22(1):1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2024.01.003
Stropp J et al. 2020. The ghosts of forests past and future: deforestation and botanical sampling in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecography 43(7):979-989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05026
Teixeira N et al. 2019. Edible fruits from Brazilian biodiversity: A review on their sensorial characteristics versus bioactivity as tool to select research. Food Res Int 119:325-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.01.058
Tseng Y-H et al. 2007. Text mining techniques for patent analysis. Inf Process Manag 43(5):1216-1247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2006.11.011
Van Eck NJ, Waltman L 2017. Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics 111:1053-1070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
Verberne S et al. 2010. Quantifying the challenges in parsing patent claims. Radboud University Nijmegen, 01-09.
Vieira ICG et al. 2008. Deforestation and threats to the biodiversity of Amazonia. Braz J Biol 68:949-956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842008000500004
Vincent CL et al. 2017. Patent data mining in fisheries sector: An analysis using Questel-Orbit and Espacenet. World Pat Inf 51:22-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2017.11.004
Visentin MADR 2011. A sustentabilidade da exploração comercial da biodiversidade brasileira sob a ótica de tratados internacionais. Revista CEJ 15(52).
Visser C 2006. Biodiversity, bioprospecting, and biopiracy: a prior informed consent requirement for patents: analyses. SA Mercantile Law Journal 18(4):429-439.
WIPO 2024a. World Intellectual Property Organization. PatentScope. Disponível em: <https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/search.jsf>.
WIPO 2024b. World Intellectual Property Organization. IPC publication. Disponível em: https://ipcpub.wipo.int/?notion=scheme&version=20240101
WIPO 2024c. World Intellectual Property Organization. PCT. Disponível em: https://www.wipo.int/pct/pt/
Zhao L 2022. On the grant rate of patent cooperation treaty applications: Theory and evidence. Econ Model 117:106051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106051
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Alice Munz Fernandes, Odilene de Souza Teixeira, Emerson Barros Garcia, Maria Luiza Costa Matos, Gleimiria Batista da Costa Matos, Raul Dirceu Pazdiora
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Esta revista oferece acesso livre imediato ao seu conteúdo, seguindo o princípio de que disponibilizar gratuitamente o conhecimento científico ao público proporciona maior democratização mundial do conhecimento.
A partir da publicação realizada na revista os autores possuem copyright e direitos de publicação de seus artigos sem restrições.
A Revista Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science segue os preceitos legais da licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
