Personality and Marital Breakup in Heterosexual Couples: An Integrative Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2025v14i1.p362-381Keywords:
personality, rupture, conjugality, satisfactionAbstract
This study aims to carry out a systematic review of scientific articles relating personality and marital breakdown of heterosexual couples, analyzing the literature on this topic from the Big Five Personality Traits as a theoretical framework. Researches on Scielo, CAPES and BVS databases found 7 articles about this issue, from which 2 were selected. One of them, which came closest to the research topic, was placed in the AI software Research Rabits, where 5,200 related articles were tracked. Using the filter of articles published in the last 8 years, 9 articles were selected, totalizing 11 articles for evaluation, after further discussion with an independent committee. The analysis shows an international and national overview of the proposed topic, highlighting few publications and studies in Brazil that correlate personality as an element of marital breakup in heterosexual couples. The selected literature shows there is consensus relating personality and relationship satisfaction, which interferes in the marital breakdown process, especially regarding neuroticism.
Keywords: Personality; rupture; conjugality; satisfaction.
References
Allport GW 1966. Pattern and growth in personality. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Michigan, 608 pp.
Arrànz Becker O 2013. Effects of similarity of life goals, values, and personality on relationship satisfaction and stability: Findings from a two-wave panel study. Personal Relationships 20(4): 443-461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01417.
Baker et al, 2004; Costa & McCrae, 1992; Goldberg, 1990, 1992; Hutz et al, 1998; Hutz & Nunes, 2001; John, 1990; McCrae & John, 1992; Nunes, 2000, 2007; Nunes & Hutz, 2007; Rabelo et al., 2009
Ben-Naim S, Hirschberger G, Ein-Dor T, Mikulincer M 2013. An experimental study of emotion regulation during relationship conflict interactions: The moderating role of attachment orientations. Emotion 13(3): 506–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031473.
Benet-Martinez V, John OP 1998. Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait–multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4): 729–750.
Berrios R, Totterdell P, Niven K 2015. Why do you make us feel good? Correlates and interpersonal consequences of affective presence in speed-dating. European Journal of Personality 29: 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1944.
Bono JE, Boles TL, Judge TA, Lauver KJ 2002. The role of personality in task and relationship conflict. Journal of Personality 70(3): 311-344.
Booth A, Johnson D, Edwards JN 1983. Measuring marital instability. Journal of Marriage and Family 42(4): 387–394. https://doi.org/10.2307/351841.
Botwin MD, Buss DM, Shackelford TK 1997. Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality 65(1): 107–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00531.x.
Bueno EF, Prado JS 1989. Educação emocional: A arte de unir-se. Cortez, São Paulo, 132 pp.
Burger JM 2010. Personality. 8th ed. Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont, 518 pp.
Carron, E. B., & Pires, T. C. (2019). Families living in postmodernity: Theories and pathologies. Rio de Janeiro.
Caruso I 1989. A separação dos amantes, uma fenomenologia da morte. Diadorim Cortez, São Paulo, 353 pp. (Originalmente publicado em 1968).
Cattell RB 1965. The scientific analysis of personality. Penguin, Londres, 400pp.
Cattell RB, Eber HW, Tatsuoka MM 1970. Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factors Questionnaire. The Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Champaign IL.
Chopik WJ, Lucas RE 2019. Efeitos de ator, parceiro e similaridade da personalidade no mundo global e experimentou bem-estar. Journal of Research in Personality 78: 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.12.008.
Cirhinlioglu Z, Tepe YK, Cirhinlioglu FG2016. The Relationship between Personality Traits and Marital Quality in Married Couples in Turkey. The Anthropologist 25(1-2): 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2016.11892086.
Costa CB, Mosmann CP 2015. Estratégias de resolução dos conflitos conjugais: Percepções de um grupo focal. Psico 46(4): 472-482. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2015.4.20606.
Costa CB, Mosmann CP 2021. Traços de personalidade e ajustamento conjugal: Interação entre aspectos intra e interpessoais. Paidéia 31: e3107.
Costa, FG 2018. Os impactos do trabalho na subjetividade da mulher e em suas relações familiares. Pretextos 3(6): 434-452.
Costa PT, McCrae RR 1991. The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R): Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa FL.
Costa, PT, McCrae RR 1992. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa FL.
Costa PT, McCrae RR 1995. Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment 64(1): 21-50.
Costa PT, McCrae RR 1996. Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the Five-Factor Model. In WF Overton (Ed.). Theory and method (Vol. 1). Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, p 273-300.
Costa PT, McCrae RR 1999. A five-factor theory perspective. In LA Pervin, OP John (Eds.). Handbook of personality: Theory and research. Guilford Press, New York, p. 139-153.
Costa PT, McCrae RR 2003. Personality in Adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory Perspective. Guilford Press, New York, 268 pp.
Decuyper M, De Bolle M, De Fruyt F 2012. Personality similarity, perceptual accuracy, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Personal Relationships 19(1): 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01344.x.
Del Priore M 2014. Histórias e conversas de mulher: Amor, sexo, casamento e trabalho em mais de 200 anos de história. 2nd. ed. Planeta, São Paulo, 304 pp.
Dyrenforth PS, Kashy DA, Donnellan MB, Lucas RE 2010. Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99: 690-702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020385
Entelmann, M 2005. Teoria de conflitos: Hacia um nuevo paradigma. Editora Gedisa, Barcelona, 224 pp.
Feist J, Feist GJ, Roberts TA 2015. Teoria da personalidade. 8th. ed. AMGH, Porto Alegre, 441 pp.
Féres-Carneiro T 1995. Casais em terapia: Um estudo sobre a manutenção e a ruptura do casamento. Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria 44(2): 67-70.
Féres-Carneiro T 1997. Escolha amorosa e interação conjugal na heterossexualidade e na homossexualidade. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica 10(2): 351-368.
Figueira SA 1987. O moderno e o arcaico na nova família brasileira: notas sobre a dimensão invisível na mudança social. In Uma nova família? O moderno e o arcaico na família de classe média brasileira. Zahar, Rio de Janeiro, p. 11-30.
Finn C, Mitte K, Neyer FJ 2013. The relationship-specific interpretation bias mediates the link between neuroticism and satisfaction in couples. European Journal of Personality 27(2): 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1862.
Fisher TD, McNulty JK 2008. Neuroticism and marital satisfaction: The mediating role played by the sexual relationship. Journal of Family Psychology 22(1): 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.112.
Funder DC, Furr R, Colvin C 2000. The riverside behavioral Q-sort: A tool for the description of social behavior. Journal of Personality 68: 451–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00103
Garcia LF 2006. Teorias psicométricas da personalidade. In CE Flores-Mendoza, R. Colom (Orgs.). Introdução à psicologia das diferenças individuais. Artmed, Porto Alegre, p. 219-242.
Giddens A 2013. A transformação da intimidade: Sexualidade, amor e erotismo nas sociedades modernas, 9th. ed. Unesp, São Paulo, 228 pp.
Giddens A 2000. Mundo em descontrole: o que a globalização está fazendo de nós. Record, Rio de Janeiro,108 pp.
Goldberg LR 1990. An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(6): 1216-1229.
Goldberg LR 1992. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment 4(1): 26-42.
Gosling SD, Rentfrow PJ, Swann WB 2003. A very brief measure of the Big Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality 37(6): 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1.
Graziano WG, Jensen-Campbell LA, Hair EC 1996. Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70: 820-835.
Großmann I, Hottung A, KrohnGrimberghe A 2019. Machine learning meets partner matching: Predicting the future relationship quality based on personality traits. PLoS ONE 14(3): e0213569. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213569.
Gross JJ, John OP 2003. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(2): 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348.
Guedes MC 2008. A presença feminina nos cursos universitários e nas pós-graduações: Desconstruindo a ideia da universidade como espaço masculino. História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos 15: 117-132.
He Q, Wang Y, Xing Y, Yu Y 2018. Dark personality, interpersonal rejection, and marital stability of Chinese couples: An actor–partner interdependence mediation model. Personality and Individual Differences 134(1): 232-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.003.
Heilborn ML 2004. Dois é par: Gênero e identidade sexual em contexto igualitário. Garamond, Rio de Janeiro, 217 pp.
Hellmuth JC, McNulty JK 2008. Neuroticism, marital violence, and the moderating role of stress and behavioral skills. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95(1): 166-180. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.166.
Humberg S, Nestler S, Back MD 2019. Response surface analysis in personality and social psychology: Checklist and clarifications for the case of congruence hypotheses. Social Psychological and Personality Science 10: 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618757600.
Hutz CS, Nunes CH, Silveira AD, Serra J, Anton M, Wieczorek LS 1998. O desenvolvimento de marcadores para a avaliação da personalidade no modelo dos Cinco Grandes Fatores. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica 11(3): 395-409.
Illouz E 2012. Por que o amor dói: a experiência amorosa. Seuil, Paris, 293 pp.
John OP, Angleitner A, Ostendorf F 1988. The lexical approach to personality: A historical review of trait taxonomic research. European Journal of Personality 2: 171-203.
Johnson JA 1997. Units of analysis for the description and explanation of personality. In R Hogan, J Johnson, S. Briggs (Eds.). Handbook of Personality. Academic Press, New York, p. 73-93.
Karney BR, Bradbury TN 1995. The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin 118(1): 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3.
Karney BR, Bradbury TN 1997. Neuroticism, marital interaction, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72(5): 1075–1092. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1075.
Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL 2006. Dyadic data analysis. The Guilford Press, New York, 458 pp.
Lamela D, Figueiredo B, Bastos A 2010. Adaptação ao divórcio e relações coparentais: Contributos da teoria da vinculação. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica 23(3): 562-574.
Maldonado MT 2009. Casamento, término e reconstrução: o que acontece antes, durante e depois da separação. Integrare, São Paulo, 264 pp.
Malouff JM, Thorsteinsson EB, Schutte NS, Bhullar N, Rooke SE 2010. The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality 44(1): 124-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.09.004.
Marimón MM, Vilarrasa GS 2014. Como construímos universos: Amor, cooperação e conflito (S. M. Felix, Trad.). Editora Unesp, São Paulo, 360 pp.
McCrae RR, Costa PT 2008. The Five-Factor Theory of personality. In OP John, RW Robins, LA Pervin (Eds.). Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed). Guilford Press, New York, p. 159-181.
Morris CG 1996. Understanding Psychology. 3rd Edition. Prentice Hal, New Jersey, 682 pp.
Mund M, Finn C, Hagemeyer B, Neyer FJ 2016. Compreendendo transações dinâmicas entre traços de personalidade e relacionamentos de parceiros. Current Directions in Psychological Science 25(5): 411–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416663704
Muris P, Merckelbach H, Otgaar H, Meijer E 2017. The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the dark triad (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy). Perspectives on Psychological Science 12(2): 183-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691616666070.
Nunes CHS, Hutz CS 2002. O modelo dos Cinco Grandes Fatores de Personalidade. In R Primi (Org.). Temas em avaliação psicológica. Casa do Psicólogo, São Paulo, p. 40-49.
O'Meara MS, South SC 2019. Os cinco grandes domínios de personalidade e satisfação no relacionamento: Efeitos diretos e mudanças correlacionadas ao longo do tempo. Journal of Personality 87(6): 1206-1220. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12468.
Peres CS, Fernandes JL 2020. Gênero e família na contemporaneidade: Uma aproximação. Brasília.
Pimentel CE, Donnell ED 2008. A relação da preferência musical com os cinco grandes fatores da personalidade. Psicologia Ciência e Profissão 28(4): 696-713.
Rezende JC, Mandelbaum BPH 2014. Do altar ao fórum: a visão de mulheres separadas sobre os motivos da separação conjugal. Rev. Transformações em Psicologia 5(1): 1-28.
Roberts BW, Kuncel NR, Shiner R, Caspi A, Goldberg LR 2007. The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socio-economic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2(4), 313-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x.
Roberts BW, Mroczek DK 2008. Personality trait change in adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science 17(1): 31-35.
Sadikaj G, Moskowitz D, Zuroff D 2015. Felt security in daily interactions as a mediator of the effect of attachment on satisfaction with a romantic partner. European Journal of Personality 29: 187–200.
Salém T 1989. O Casal igualitário: Princípios e Impasses. Revista Brasileira de Ciência sociais 3(9): 24-37.
Sanson A, Bretherton I 2001. The role of temperament in the development of personality and behavior. In CH Hart & AW McMahon (Eds.). The Handbook of Parenting: Volume 1, Theory and Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Nova York, p. 211-234.
Saucier G 1994. Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment 63(3): 506-516.
Schaffhuser K, Allemand M, Martin M 2014. Personality traits and relationship satisfaction in intimate couples: Three perspectives on personality. European Journal of Personality 28(2): 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1948.
Secco ML, Lucas, MG 2015. A vida amorosa de mulheres financeiramente independente. Pensando famílias 19(1): 61-76.
Silva MG, Nascimento JS, Dauzacker RA, Franco C, Garcia EA, Canete RS 2021. Impacto psicológico do divórcio dos pais sobre o desenvolvimento emocional infantil. Revista Multidisciplinar em Saúde 2(4): 344-344.
Soares MS 2019. O direito da família na igualdade e a cidadania. Atlas, São Paulo.
Solomon BC Jackson JJ 2014. Why Do Personality Traits Predict Divorce? Multiple Pathways Through Satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 106(6): 978 –996. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036190.
Somer O, Korkmaz M, Tatar A 2002. Development of five factor personality inventory. Turkish Journal of Psycholog 17(49): 21-37.
Soto CJ, Kronauer A, Liang J 2013. Five-Factor Model of Personality. In SK Whitbourne (Ed.). Encyclopedia of adulthood and aging. Vol. 2. Wiley, Hoboken, p. 506-510.
Soto CJ, John OP 2017. The Next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality Assessment 99(6): 610-628.
Štěrbová Z, Bártová K, Nováková L, Varella MA, Havlíček J, Valentova JV 2021. A qualidade do relacionamento é influenciada pelos efeitos do ator e do parceiro, mas não pelos efeitos de similaridade e discrepância: Um estudo das populações brasileira e tcheca. Personality and Individual Differences 168: 110250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110250.
Vater A, Schröder-Abé M 2015. Explaining the Link Between Personality and Relationship Satisfaction: Emotion Regulation and Interpersonal Behaviour in Conflict Discussions. European Journal of Personality 29(2): 201-215 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1993.
Vieira C 2020. Direito da família: História, instituições e do Direito de Família. Lumen Júris, Rio de Janeiro.
Weidmann R, Ledermann T, Grob A 2016. The interdependence of personality and satisfaction in couple: a review. European Psychologist 21(4): 284-295. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1027/1016-9040/a000261.
Weidmann R, Purol MF, Alabdullah A, Ryan SM, Wright EG, Oh J, Chopik WJ 2023. Trait and facet personality similarity and relationship and life satisfaction in romantic couples. Journal of Research in Personality 104: 104378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2023.104378.
Weidmann R, Schönbrodt FD, Ledermann T, Grob A 2017. Concurrent and longitudinal dyadic polynomial regression analyses of Big Five traits and relationship satisfaction: Does similarity matter? Journal of Research in Personality 70: 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.04.003.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marisa Mota da Silva Espindola, Sebastião Benício da Costa Neto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This journal offers immediate free access to its content, following the principle that providing free scientific knowledge to the public, we provides greater global democratization of knowledge.
As of the publication in the journal the authors have copyright and publication rights of their articles without restrictions.
The Revista Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science follows the legal precepts of the Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International. 
