Percepción de barreras de género para el ejercicio del liderazgo en una universidad estatal de Chile

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2024v13i3.p185-203

Keywords:

university management, gender barriers, female leadership, higher education

Abstract

Gender barriers in academia are a set of obstacles that limit women's equal participation in academia. These barriers can manifest themselves in various forms, from cultural expectations and gender stereotypes to institutional policies and everyday practices. The objective of the study is to analyze the perceptions of female academics in management positions in a state university in Chile on gender barriers to leadership development in public universities. The study used a qualitative and descriptive methodology, interpreting the reality as expressed by the volunteer participants. The main results identified significant barriers to female leadership, highlighting the perception of gender inequality and difficulties in participation and decision-making. The interviews revealed that, although gender policies have been implemented in Chilean universities, challenges persist, such as institutional culture, to ensure true equality of opportunity and development of women in university leadership positions.  The findings suggest considerations that may be useful in developing more inclusive strategies in university management.

References

Aguerrevere G, Araujo MC, Bosch M, Mendoza M 2021. The Big Opportunity: From Crisis to the Transformation of Women's Employment. Available from https://publications.iadb.org/en/big-opportunity-crisis-transformation-womens-employment

Alqahtani T 2019. Barriers to Women's Leadership. Granite Journal: A Postgraduate Interdisciplinary Journal 3(2):34-41. Available from: https://acortar.link/uaQeOY

Agut S, Hernández M 2007. Factores que dificultan el acceso de las mujeres a puestos de responsabilidad: una revisión teórica. Apuntes de Psicología 25(2):201-214. https://idus.us.es/bitstream/handle/11441/84814/1/7.pdf?sequence=1

Arranz F 2004. Las mujeres y la universidad española: estructuras de dominación y disposiciones feminizadas en el profesorado universitario. Available from: https://docta.ucm.es/bitstreams/e1bebf92-0ad7-4b20-9846-de0ed3734837/download

Alcázar L, Balarín M 2018. Desigualdad en la academia: mujeres en las ciencias sociales peruanas. Grupo Sofía y GRADE. Available from: https://www.grade.org.pe/publicaciones/desigualdad-en-la-academia-mujeres-en-las-ciencias-sociales-peruanas/

Ashraf M, Cheema HA, Farooq M, Mustafa B, Answer A, Shahid S, Ashraf N. 2023. Gender bias and ‘doctor brides’. A social dilemma of medical students in Pakistan. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 73(05): Article 05. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.6965

Auriol L 2010. Careers of doctorate holders: Employment and mobility patterns. OECD. Recuperado de https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/careers-of-doctorate-holders_5kmh8phxvvf5-en

Ávila M 2018. Feminismo neoliberal, esa “otra” cosa escandalosa. Investigación y género. Reflexiones desde la desde la investigación para avanzar en igualdad. Available from: https://idus.us.es/bitstream/handle/11441/80208/Pages%20from%20Actas%20VII%20Congreso%20I%2BG%202018-6.pdf

Avolio B, Chávez J, Vílchez-Román C 2020. Factors that contribute to the underrepresentation of women in science careers worldwide: A literature review. Social Psychology of Education. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11218-020-09558

Axelsdóttir L, Steinþórsdóttir FS, Einarsdóttir PJ 2022. A gender budgeting Community of Practice and targeted implementation projects: A potential to challenge gender biases in decision-making in research organisations? En: A Community of Practice Approach to Improving Gender Equality in Research. Routledge.

Baeza A, Lamadrid S 2015. ¿Igualdad en la academia? Barreras de género e iniciativas en una universidad pública (2013-2018). Pensamiento Educativo. Revista de Investigación Educacional Latinoamericana 56(1): 1-17.

Batthyány K, Genta N, Perrotta V 2014. La dimensión de género en el saber experto en cuidado infantil. Psicología, Conocimiento y Sociedad 4(1):33-58. Available from: http://www.scielo.edu.uy/pdf/pcs/v4n1/v4n1a03.pdf

Bracamontes PE, Castañeda XY, Pérez R. 2021. Análisis con visión de género de las desventajas acumuladas de las investigadoras en los procesos de producción del conocimiento en México. Brazilian Journal of Education, Technology and Society 14(Special Edition): 61-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v14.se1.2021.61-74

Bosco A, Verney S, Bermúdez S, Tonarelli A 2023. Surviving in a male academia: Gender gap, publication strategies and career stage in South European political science journals. European Political Science. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-023-00443-8

Buquet A 2013. ¿Sólo el género importa? Una mirada interseccional a los obstáculos que enfrentan las académicas. El caso de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Available from: https://encr.pw/oLp0t

Canales, M 2006. Metodologías de investigación de investigación social. Introducción a los oficios. Sexismo en Educación Superior: Santiago: LOM.

Catalán AME, Albornoz N 2023. Sexismo en Educación Superior: ¿Cómo se Reproduce la Inequidad de Género en el contexto Universitario? Psykhe 32(1): Article 1. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.2021.35613

Colther, C 2022. Desigualdad de género en el sistema universitario chileno. Multidisciplinary business review, 15(1), 50-62. Epub 29 de junio de 2022.https://dx.doi.org/10.35692/07183992.15.1.6

Courtois ADM, O'Keefe,T 2015. Precarity in the ivory cage: Neoliberalism and casualisation of work in the Irish higher education sector. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies 13(1) Available from: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1538710/

Crocco-Valdiviaa A, & Galaz-Valderrama, C 2023. Mujeres en la academia: Exploración de una organización generizada a partir de una revisión sistemática. Estudios pedagógicos (Valdivia) 49 (2) http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052023000200439

Dinamarca C, & Trujillo M 2021. Educación superior chilena y violencia de género: demandas desde los feminismos universitarios. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 19(2), 191-212. Epub September 22, 2021.https://doi.org/10.11600/rlcsnj.19.2.4537

Escolano E 2009. El poder como asignatura pendiente de las académicas en las universidades españolas. En: Género y trabajo en las universidades (pp. 83-127). Guadalajara: Universidad de Guadalajara.

Espino A 2017. Gender equality in Uruguay. Gender Equality in a Global Perspective. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315639505-6/gender-equality-uruguay-alma-espino

Faniko K, Ellemer N, Derks B 2022. Lack of ambition or lack of support? Diverging career experiences of men and women explain the persistence of gender bias. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 52(9): 851-864. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12883

Gaete-Quezada R 2015. El techo de cristal en las universidades estatales chilenas. Un ánálisis exploratorio. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior 6(17):3- 20

Ganga-Contreras, F., Alarcón, N. Paillamán, M. Navarrete, E., Araya-Castillo, L. 2021. Formación académica del ápice estratégico de las universidades estatales en Chile. Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science–ISSN 2238-8869, v. 10, n. 2 https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2021v10i2.p261-281

Ganga-Contreras, F., Piñones-Santana, M., Pedraja-Rejas, L., Valderrama Hidalgo, C. 2014. Igualdad de género: un gran desafío para la gerencia de latinoamérica. Prisma Social, (13),852-882.

Galizzi, G, Mc Bride K, Siboni B 2024. Patriarchy persists: Experiences of barriers to women’s career progression in Italian accounting academia. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 99, 102625. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2023.102625

Gallego-Morón N, Matus-López M 2023. Exploring self-exclusion as a gendered barrier in Spanish universities. A mixed methodological study. Women's Studies International Forum. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102797

Gallego-Morón N, Matus-López M 2021. Análisis de género de las barreras en la promoción académica. Estudio de caso de una universidad argentina. Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 29 (57) Epub 06, https://doi.org/10.18504/pl2957-011-2021

García-Holgado A, Verdugo-Castro S, Dominguez A, Hernández-Armenta I, García-Peñalvo FJ, Vázquez-Ingelmo A, Sánchez-Gómez MC 2021. The experience of women students in engineering and mathematics careers: a focus group study. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 50-56).

García-Ramos L, Peña-Baena R 2021. Empowering young women into STEM in Latin America: W-STEM 2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Vienna, Austria, 2021, pp. 1087-1092, doi: 10.1109/EDUCON46332.2021.9453890. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9453890

Gómez-Arízaga MP, Navarro, M, Martin A 2020. Socio-Emotional Dimensions in Gifted Chilean High School Students with Interests in STEM: Influence of Gender and University Enrichment Program Participation. Technology Education 16(12), em1929. Available from: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9374

Gupta GR, Oomman N, Grown C, Conn K, Hawkes S 2019. Gender equality and gender norms: framing the opportunities for health. The Lancet 393(10190):2550–2562. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30651-8

Gullo GL, Sperandio J 2020. Gender and the superintendency: The power of career paths. Frontiers in Education 5:68. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00068

Hausmann R, Tyson LD, Zahidi S 2008. The global gender gap. World Economic Forum. Available from: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GenderGap_Report_2008.pdf

Hernández R, Mendoza C 2018. Metodología de la Investigación. México: Mc Graw-Hill México DF.

Hernández, C 2021. Las mujeres STEM y sus apreciaciones sobre su transitar por la carrera universitaria. Nova scientia, 13(27), 00026. Epub 21 de febrero de 2022.: https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v13i27.2753

Hernández C, Hernández C. 2023. Análisis de percepciones en cargos STEM ocupados por mujeres. RIDE. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 13(26), e047. Epub 09 de octubre de 2023. https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v13i26.1486

Howe-Walsh L, Turnbull S 2016. Barriers to women leaders in academia: tales from science and technology. Studies in Higher Education. 41(3): 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.929102

Hurtado-Reina, J, Meza, P, & Velasco, E 2024. Women in higher education: Leadership, coordination, and bibliography. Frontiers in Education 9, 1368431. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1368431

Huzum, N 2016. Gender bias in academic evaluations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Higher Education 57(2), 247-273.

James R, Fisher JRB, Carlos-Grotjahn C, Boylan, MS, Dembereldash B, Demissie MZ, Diaz C, Gibbs B, Konia R, Lyons K, Possingham H, Robinson CJ, Tang T, Butt N 2023. Gender bias and inequity holds women back in their conservation careers. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1056751

Johnson NN, Fournillier JB 2023. Intersectionality and leadership in context: Examining the intricate paths of four black women in educational leadership in the United States. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 26(2), 296-317. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1818132

Khan M, Sulaiman R, Nazir,O, Khan S, Awan S 2024. The unseen in the glass ceilings: Examining women’s career advancement in higher education institutions through a multi-level institutional lens. Human Resource Development International, 1-28. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2024.2342762

Kapareliotis I, Miliopoulou GZ 2019. Gender bias in academia: An attempt to render the intangible tangible. Diversity within Diversity Management. https://l1nq.com/tcVJ0

Hirsch B 2021. Participación femenina en gestión directiva universitaria en Chile. Gobierno y Administración Pública (2), 62-77. Available from: https://revistas.udec.cl/index.php/gyap/article/view/5970/6486

Larraz B, Roig R, Aybar C, Pavía JM 2023. COVID-19 and the Housework Gender Division: Traditional or New Gender Patterns? Journal of Family Issues, 45(6):1403-1430. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X231172287

Lawson MA, Martin AE, Huda I, Matz SC 2022. Hiring women into senior leadership positions is associated with a reduction in gender stereotypes in organizational language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(9): e2026443119. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026443119

Levanon A, Grusky DB 2016. The persistence of extreme gender segregation in the twenty-first century. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 122(2): 573-619 (47 pages) The University of Chicago Press.

Maes J, Marynissen L 2024. The Impact of Partners’ Relative Wages on Couples’ Gender Division of Paid Work after Parenthood across Origin Groups. Social Sciences, 13(6):296. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13060296

Maloutas T, Spyrellis SN 2020. Segregation trends in Athens: The changing residential distribution of occupational categories during the 2000s. Regional Studies. Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4):462-471. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1556392

Martínez M 2010. Ciencia y arte de la metodología cualitativa. Editorial Trillas, México.

Mc Dowell L 2009. La definición del género. En El género en el derecho. Ensayos críticos (pp. 5-6).

Nielsen MW, Pedersen JV, Larregue J 2024. Getting ahead in the social sciences: How parenthood and publishing contribute to gender gaps in academic career advancement. The British Journal of Sociology, 75(3): 322-346. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.13088

Nosrat C, Martin-Tuite P, Jiang F, Broering J, Shindel AW 2024. Gender Bias in Letters of Recommendation: Relevance to Urology Match Outcomes and Pursuit of Fellowship Training/Academic Career. Urology, 183: 281-287. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2023.09.053

O Grada A, Ní Laoire C, Linehan C, Boylan G, Connolly L 2015. Naming the parts: a case-study of a gender equality initiative with academic women. Gender in Management, 30(5): 358-378. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-09-2013-0118

Pastor I, Belzunegui À, Moreno B, Mañas C 2021. La igualdad de oportunidades en la universidad: las percepciones del PDI. Papers: Revista de Sociología, 95(2).

Powell GN 2019. Women and men in management. SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California.

Ramirez FO, Wotipka CM 2001. Slowly but surely? The global expansion of women's participation in science and engineering fields of study, 1972-92. Sociology of Education. 74(3):231 DOI:10.2307/2673276

Ramírez PEB, Bernal XYC Mora RP 2021. Análisis con visión de género de las desventajas acumuladas de las investigadoras en los procesos de producción del conocimiento en México. Cadernos de Educação Technology and Society (BRAJETS) v.14, Special Edition: 61-74,

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v14.se1.2021

Rodríguez-Ponce, E., Pedraja-Rejas, L., Rodríguez-Ponce, J. 2020. La influencia de los regímenes de gobernanzas sobre la calidad de las titulaciones universitarias: un estudio exploratorio desde Chile. Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2020v9i3.p182-196

Showkat M, Nagina R, Nori U, Baba MA, Shah MA 2024. Empowering women in the digital age: Can digital financial services fulfil the promise of financial autonomy and gender equality in the attainment of Sustainable Development Goal 5? Cogent Economics & Finance 12(1), 2342459. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2024.2342459

Sobaih AEE, Abu AE 2024. Challenges to Cracking the Glass Ceiling among Saudi Women in the Tourism Industry. Tourism and Hospitality, 5, 203–224. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ tourhosp5010014

Tomás M, Guillamón C 2009. Las barreras y los obstáculos en el acceso de las profesoras universitarias a los cargos de gestión académica. Revista de Educación 350: 253-275. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/78545919.pdf

Torrado MPE, Perera P 2024. La academia vaciada: Neoliberalismo, patriarcado y crisis del conocimiento crítico. En-Claves del Pensamiento, 36, 19-36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.46530/ecdp.v0i36.672

Troncoso E, Suárez-Amaya W, Ormazabal M, Sandoval L 2023. Does the Faculty’s Perception of Gender Discrimination Relate to Its Assessment of Organizational Democracy in the University? Behavioral Sciences. 2023, 13(6), 450; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13060450

van Tienoven TP, Minnen J, Glorieux A, Laurijssen I, Te Braak P, Glorieux I 2023. Locking Down Gender Roles? A Time-Use Perspective on Gender Division of Household Labour during the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown in Belgium. Journal of Family Issues, 44(3):654-680. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X211054463

Wang H, Wareewanich T 2024. A Gender Role Perspective on Women’s Leadership in Chinese Higher Education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP) 14(3):108-122. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v14i3.48497

Watanabe K, Kwarteng A 2024. Unveiling the glass ceiling phenomenon and mitigating strategies through organizational justice: a conceptual paper, Cogent Business & Management, 11(1):2331981 Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2331981

Published

2024-11-07

How to Cite

SUÁREZ-AMAYA, Wendolin; GANGA-CONTRERAS, Francisco Anibal; PÉREZ, Marcela Freire; VILLEGAS , Francisco Javier. Percepción de barreras de género para el ejercicio del liderazgo en una universidad estatal de Chile . Fronteiras - Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, [S. l.], v. 13, n. 3, p. 185–203, 2024. DOI: 10.21664/2238-8869.2024v13i3.p185-203. Disponível em: https://revistas.unievangelica.edu.br/index.php/fronteiras/article/view/7591. Acesso em: 22 dec. 2024.