Metodologia de Avaliação da Logística Empresarial Sustentável à Luz dos ODS 9, 11 E 12

Caroline Vieira de Macedo Brasil; Dayane Martins Salles; Valdir Fernandes

doi:10.21664/2238-8869.2025v14i2.p330-346

Autores

Caroline Vieira de Macedo Brasil Centro Universitário Internacional Uninter https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4782-3560
Dayane Martins Salles Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7250-1715
Valdir Fernandes Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0568-2920

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2025v14i2.p330-346

Palavras-chave:

indicadores de sustentabilidade, infraestrutura urbana, logística sustentável, relatórios de sustentabilidade, SustainLogTrack

Resumo

A logística empresarial apresenta, ano após ano, um crescimento acelerado que dificulta a estruturação da sustentabilidade nesse setor diante da falta rastreabilidade e aumento dos impactos negativos no meio ambiente. Considerando a importância da estruturação desse setor e das metas dos Objetivos do Desenvolvimento Sustentável, esse artigo propõe uma metodologia de análise da logística empresarial sustentável no contexto dos ODS 9, 11 e 12, denominada SustainLogTrack. O artigo é apresentado em duas seções. A primeira estabelece, através de uma revisão narrativa, os impactos e as possibilidades de contribuição da logística através de cada um dos modais de transporte (rodoviário, ferroviário, aquaviário, aeroviário e dutoviário), seguida da correlação entre duas metas de cada um dos ODS analisados e a logística sustentável. Embasada nesse quadro-resposta, na seção dois do artigo é proposta uma metodologia de análise de relatórios de sustentabilidade. A metodologia desenvolvida resultou em 14 indicadores e um esquema de pontuação que permite analisar empresas de qualquer setor em 5 faixas de performance: inexistente, fraco, regular, bom e ótimo. Os resultados alcançados podem ser aplicados às empresas que buscam a sustentabilidade em seus processos logísticos, bem como para os gestores públicos que buscam identificar e investir na infraestrutura necessária para a execução da logística sustentável em sua região. A aplicação da metodologia SustainLogTrack foi realizada em um segundo artigo.

Referências

Abbasi M, Nilsson F 2016. Developing environmentally sustainable logistics: Exploring themes and challenges from a logistics service providers' perspective. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.04.004

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 46:273-283.

Abduaziz O, Cheng JK, Tahar RM, Varma R 2015. Hybrid Simulation Model for Green Logistics Assessment in Automotive Industry. Procedia Engineering 100:960-969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.455

ABVE - Associação Brasileira do Veículo Elétrico 2024 [homepage on the Internet] [S.l.]: Infraestrutura de recarga acelera no país e apresenta crescimento de 179%. Disponível em: https://abve.org.br/infraestrutura-de-recarga-acelera-no-pais-e-apresenta-crescimento-de-179/

Antiqueira LMOR, Sekine ES 2020. Os "erres" pós pandemia: princípios para sustentabilidade e cidadania. Revista Brasileira de Educação Ambiental (RevBEA) 15(4):70-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34024/revbea.2020.v15.10752

Arvianto A, Sopha BM, Asih AMS, Imron MA 2021. City logistics challenges and innovative solutions in developed and developing economies: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Engineering Business Management 13:1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790211039723

BALLOU RH 2007. Gerenciamento da cadeia de suprimentos/logística empresarial. Bookman, Porto Alegre, 616 pp.

Bell EM, Horvath A 2020. Modeling the carbon footprint of fresh produce: effects of transportation, localness, and seasonality on US orange markets. Environmental Research Letters 15(3):034040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6c2f

Blinova E, Ponomarenko T, Tesovskaya S 2023. Key Corporate Sustainability Assessment Methods for Coal Companies. Sustainability 15(7):5763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075763

BRASIL. Lei n.º 12.305, de 2 de agosto de 2010. Casa Civil. Brasília/DF. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2010/lei/l12305.htm. Acesso em: 17/02/2025.

BRASIL. Decreto n.º 10.936, de 12 de janeiro de 2022. Secretaria-Geral. Brasília/DF. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2019-2022/2022/decreto/d10936.htm. Acesso em: 17/02/2025.

BRASIL. Lei n.° 14.600, de 19 de junho de 2023. Casa Civil. Brasília/DF. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2023/lei/L14600.htm . Acesso em: 17/02/2025.

Chalgham W, Wu KY, Mosleh A 2020. System-level prognosis and health monitoring modeling framework and software implementation for gas pipeline system integrity management. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 84:103671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103671

Čižiūnienė K, Matijošius J, Sokolovskij E, Balevičiūtė J 2024. Assessment of Implementing Green Logistics Principles in Railway Transport: The Case of Lithuania. Sustainability 16(7):2716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072716

Costa JP, Santos LCS, Rios JM, Rodrigues AW, Dias Neto OC, Prado-Júnior J, Vale VS 2019. Estrutura e diversidade de trechos de Cerrado sensu stricto às margens de rodovias no estado de Minas Gerais. Ciência Florestal 29(2):698-714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509826869

Ellram LM, Harland CM, Weele AV, Essig M, Johnsen T, Nassimbeni G, Pagell M, Raaij EV, Rozemeijer F, Tate WL, Wynstra F 2020. Purchasing and supply management's identity: Crisis? What crisis? Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 26(1): 100583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2019.100583

Feng Y, Lai K, Zhu Q 2022. Green supply chain innovation: Emergence, adoption, and challenges. International Journal of Production Economics 248: 108497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108497

Fernandes V 2008. A racionalização da vida como processo histórico: crítica à racionalidade econômica e ao industrialismo. Cadernos EBAPE.BR 6(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-39512008000300002

Filippone A, Zhang M, Bojdo N 2019. Validation of an integrated simulation model for aircraft noise and engine emissions. Aerospace Science and Technology 89:370-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.04.008

Frota Neto JQ, Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM, Van Nunen JAEE, Heck EV 2008. Designing and evaluating sustainable logistics networks. International Journal of Production Economics 111(2): 195-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.10.014

Greene DL, Ogden JM, Lin Z 2020. Challenges in the designing, planning and deployment of hydrogen refueling infrastructure for fuel cell electric vehicles. eTransportation 6:100086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etran.2020.100086

Gualtieri M, Berico M, Grollino MG, Cremona G, La Torretta T, Malaguti A, Petralia E, Stracquadanio M, Santoro M, Benassi B, Piersanti A, Chiappa A, Bernabei M, Zanini G 2022. Emission Factors of CO2 and Airborne Pollutants and Toxicological Potency of Biofuels for Airplane Transport: A Preliminary Assessment. Toxics 10(10):617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10100617

Hejer M, Nilsson M, Raworth K, Bakker P, Berkhout F, De Boer Y, Rockström, J, Ludwig K, Kok M 2015. Beyond Cockpit-ism: Four Insights to Enhance the Transformative Potential of the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability 7(2):1651-1660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su7021651

Huang J, Shuai Y, Liu Q, Zhou H, He Z 2018. Synergy Degree Evaluation Based on Synergetics for Sustainable Logistics Enterprises. Sustainability 10(7): 2187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072187

Jayarathna CP, Agdas D, Dawes L, Miska M 2021. Exploring Sector-Specific Sustainability Indicators: A Content Analysis of Sustainability Reports in the Logistics Sector. European Business Review 34(3):321-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-02-2021-0047

Kębłowski W, Dobruszkes F, Boussauw K 2022. Moving past sustainable transport studies: Towards a critical perspective on urban transport. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 159:74-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.02.008

Kervall M, Pålsson H 2023. A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Barriers to a Fossil-Free Urban Freight System. Sustainability 15(1):186.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010186

Kovačić M, Mutavdžija M, Buntak K 2022. New Paradigm of Sustainable Urban Mobility: Electric and Autonomous Vehicles - A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 14(15):9525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159525

Kramarz M, Knop L, Przybylska E, Dohn K 2021. Stakeholders of the Multimodal Freight Transport Ecosystem in Polish-Czech-Slovak Cross-Border Area. Energies 14(8):2242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14082242

Lambert D 2014. Supply Chain Management. Supply Chain Management: Processes, Partnerships, Performance. Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida, 463 pp.

Landrum NE, Ohsowski B 2017. Identifying Worldviews on Corporate Sustainability: A Content Analysis of Corporate Sustainability Reports. Business Strategy and the Environment 27(1):128-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1989

Lenort R, Wicher P, Samolejová A, Zsifkovits H, Raith C, Miklautsch P, Pelikanova J 2022. Selecting sustainability key performance indicators for smart logistics assessment. Acta logistica 9:467-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22306/al.v9i4.350

Lim H, Park M 2020. Modeling the Spatial Dimensions of Warehouse Rent Determinants: A Case Study of Seoul Metropolitan Area, South Korea. Sustainability 12:259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010259

Liu P, Li Y 2021. An improved failure mode and effect analysis method for multi-criteria group decision-making in green logistics risk assessment. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 215:107826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107826

Lovelock J 2006. A vingança de Gaia. Intrínseca, Rio de Janeiro, 264 pp.

Maji IK, Saudi NSM, Yusuf M 2023. An assessment of green logistics and environmental sustainability: Evidence from Bauchi. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain 6:100097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2023.100097

Melo S, Macedo J, Baptista P 2018. Capacity-sharing in logistics solutions: A new pathway towards sustainability. Transport Policy 73:143-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.07.003

Nações Unidas Brasil 2025a [homepage on the Internet]. Brasília: Sobre o nosso trabalho para alcançar os Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável no Brasil. Disponível em: https://brasil.un.org/pt-br/sdgs

Nações Unidas Brasil 2025b [homepage on the Internet]. Brasília: ODS 9: Indústria, Inovação e Infraestrutura. Disponível em: https://brasil.un.org/pt-br/sdgs/9

Nações Unidas Brasil 2025c [homepage on the Internet]. Brasília: ODS 11: Cidades e Comunidades Sustentáveis. Disponível em: https://brasil.un.org/pt-br/sdgs/11

Nações Unidas Brasil 2025d [homepage on the Internet]. Brasília: ODS 12: Consumo e Produção Sustentáveis. Disponível em: https://brasil.un.org/pt-br/sdgs/12

Ness B, Urbel-Piirsalu E, Anderberg S, Olsson L 2007. Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics 60(3):498-508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023

Novoselov A, Noselova I, Aliev R, Avramenko A 2019. Preventing regional social and environmental conflicts during oil pipeline construction projects. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 7(1):773-785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.1(55)

Peplow A, Persson P, Andersen LV 2021. Evaluating annoyance mitigation in the screening of train-induced noise and ground vibrations using a single-leaf traffic barrier. Science of The Total Environment 790:147877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147877

Philippi Jr. A, Sobral M, Fernandes V, Alberto C 2014. Desenvolvimento sustentável, interdisciplinaridade e Ciências Ambientais. Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação 10(21). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21713/2358-2332.2013.v10.423

Pinto Neto JB, Gomes LC, Campista MEM, Costa LHMK 2020. An Accurate GNSS-Based Redundant Safe Braking System for Urban Elevated Rail Maglev Trains. Information 11(11):531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info11110531

Pope J, Annandale D, Morrison-Saunders A 2004. Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24(6):595-616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.03.001

Porciúncula Júnior SA, Andreoli CV 2023. Proposal for a Simplified Sustainability Report for Small and Mediumsized Enterprises. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais 58(1):67-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5327/Z2176-94781513

Qaiser FH, Ahmed K, Sykora M, Choudhary A, Simpson M 2017. Decision support systems for sustainable logistics: a review and bibliometric analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems 117(7):1376-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2016-0410

Rivas-Zaballos I, Romero-Martínez L, Moreno-Garrido I, Acevedo-Merino A, Nebot E 2021. Evaluation of three photosynthetic species smaller than ten microns as possible standard test organisms of ultraviolet-based ballast water treatment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 170:112643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112643

Rodrigue J 2024. The Geography of Transport Systems. 6a ed. Routledge, Londres, 388 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003343196

Sachs I 2009. Caminhos para o desenvolvimento sustentável. Garamond, Rio de Janeiro, 96 pp.

Salles FR, Limont M, Cortese TTP, Fernandes V 2022. Social capital in a social network: Curitiba, a city for cars. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais (RBCIAMB) 57(4):519-530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5327/Z2176-94781280

Salles DM, Giordani AC, Biagi A, Affonso IP, Fernandes V 2024. Social movements and the 2030 Agenda: the correlation between the progressist agendas and the Sustainable Development Goals. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais (RBCIAMB) 59: 2054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5327/Z2176-947812054

Shoaib M, Zhang S, Ali H. Assessment of Sustainable Green Logistics Enablers: A Robust Framework Using Fuzzy DEMATEL and ISM Approach. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 20(10):11407-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04709-4

Sidek S, Khadri NAM, Hasbolah H, Yaziz MFA, Rosli MM, Husain NM 2021. Society 5.0: Green Logistics Consciousness in Enlightening Environmental and Social Sustainability. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 842(1):012053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/842/1/012053

Silva WM 2019. Contribuições e Limitações de Revisões Narrativas e Revisões Sistemáticas na Área de Negócios. Revista de Administração Contemporânea 23(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2019190094

Sotto D, Ribeiro DG, Abiko AK, Sampaio CAC, Navas CA, Marins KRC, Sobral MCM, Philippi Jr. A, Buckeridge MS 2019. Sustentabilidade urbana: dimensões conceituais e instrumentos legais de implementação. Estudos Avançados 33(97). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-4014.2019.3397.004

Sun X, Yu H, Solvang WD, Wang Y, Wang K 2022. The application of Industry 4.0 technologies in sustainable logistics: a systematic literature review (2012-2020) to explore future research opportunities. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29(7):9560-9591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17693-y

Tarr AP, Smith IJ, Rodger CJ 2022. Carbon dioxide emissions from international air transport of people and freight: New Zealand as a case study. Environmental Research Communications 4:075012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/abf15d

Torelli R, Balluchi F, Furlotti K 2019. The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: A content analysis of sustainability reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 27(2):470-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1813

Van TC, Ramirez J, Rainey T, Ristovski Z, Brown RJ 2019. Global impacts of recent IMO regulations on marine fuel oil refining processes and ship emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 70:123-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.04.001

Vithayaporn S, Nitivattananon V, Sasaki N, Santoso DS 2023. Assessment of the Factors Influencing the Performance of the Adoption of Green Logistics in Urban Tourism in Thailand's Eastern Economic Corridor. Social Sciences 12(5):300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12050300

Vreden C, Xia T, Collie A, Pritchard E, Newnam S, Lubman DI, Almeida Neto A, Iles R 2022. The physical and mental health of Australian truck drivers: a national cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 22:464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12850-5

Zantalis F, Koulouras G, Karabetsos S, Kandris D 2019. A Review of Machine Learning and IoT in Smart Transportation. Future Internet 11(4):94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi11040094

Zhang G, Li G, Peng J 2020. Risk Assessment and Monitoring of Green Logistics for Fresh Produce Based on a Support Vector Machine.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187569