Bibliometric Analysis of Institutional Theory Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2025v14i2.p168-184Palavras-chave:
teoria institucional, análise bibliométrica, tendências de pesquisa, estudos organizacionais, evolução do conhecimentoResumo
Institutional Theory is essential to understand organizational dynamics and social impacts on business conduct. This research performs a bibliometric analysis of the Institutional Theory literature using Scopus data processed through ScientoPy and VOSviewer. The results indicate a substantial increase in academic production in the last sixty years, especially since the early 2000s. Major publication sites include the Journal of Management Inquiry and the Journal of Management Studies. Notable topics include institutional theory, logic, corporate social responsibility, and sustainability. The work of Geels (2004) on sociotechnical systems is the most referenced. The United States ranks first in research contributions, followed by the United Kingdom and Canada. The study highlights the progressive adaptation of Institutional Theory to modern challenges, indicating the need for responsiveness to evolving organizational and social contexts. Future research should focus on the influence of Institutional Theory on sustainability, its facilitation of organizational transformation, and its applicability in diverse cultural and economic settings. These findings offer a key framework for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to deepen their exploration of Institutional Theory and its relevance to organizational behavior and social impacts on business activities. This analysis provides significant insights to enhance theoretical frameworks and practical implementations of Institutional Theory in diverse organizational settings.
Referências
Abdullah, Khairul Hafezad. 2022. “Bibliometric Analysis of Safety Behaviour Research.” Asian Journal of Behavioural Sciences 4 (2): 19–33. https://doi.org/10.55057/ajbs.2022.4.2.2
Abdullah, Khairul Hafezad. 2024. Bibliometrics Made Easy with ScientoPy. Malaysia: Khairul Hafezad Abdullah.
Abdullah, Khairul Hafezad, and Sofyan Davi. 2023. “Machine Learning in Safety and Health Research: A Scientometric Analysis.” International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM) 21 (1): 17–37. https://doi.org/ 10.22034/ijism.2022.1977763.0
Ahmi, Aidi. 2022. Bibliometric Analysis for Beginners. Malaysia: UUM Press.
Aksom, Herman, and Veronika Vakulenko. 2024. “Revisiting the Scope and Suggesting Novel Domains of Institutional Theory in the Public Administration Research.” Teaching Public Administration 42 (2): 230–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/01447394231191935.
Alvesson, Mats, Tim Hallett, and Andre Spicer. 2019. “Uninhibited Institutionalisms.” Journal of Management Inquiry 28 (2): 119–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618822777.
Donthu, Naveen, Satish Kumar, Debmalya Mukherjee, Nitesh Pandey, and Weng Marc Lim. 2021. “How to Conduct a Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview and Guidelines.” Journal of Business Research 133: 285–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
Fatima, Mahum, Ghalib Ata, and Aisha Rizwan. 2023. “Institutional Pressures and Sustainable Business Practices: A Case of Strategic Environmental Management.” Global Economics Review 8 (I): 196–212. https://doi.org/10.31703/ger.2023(viii-i).18. https://doi.org/10.31703/ger.2023(VIII-II).18
Gagalyuk, Taras, and Maryna Kovalova. "Digital technologies as a driver of resilience and institutional transformation: The case of Ukrainian agroholdings." International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 27(1): 5-25. https://doi.org/10.22434/ifamr2023.0071
Hoffmann, Jochen, and Mia Thyregod Rasmussen. 2022. “Expanding the Theoretical Landscape of Organizational Socialization Research: Institutionalism and Beyond. Communication & Language At.” Work 8 (2): 4–16. https://doi.org/10.7146/claw.v8i2.135109.
Linnenluecke, Martina K., Mauricio Marrone, and Abhay K. Singh. 2020. “Conducting Systematic Literature Reviews and Bibliometric Analyses.” Australian Journal of Management 45 (2): 175–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219877678.
Merigó, José M., Carles Mulet-Forteza, Onofre Martorell, and Carolina Merigó-Lindahl. 2020. “Scientific Research in the Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Field: A Bibliometric Analysis.” Anatolia 31 (3): 494–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2020.1771602.
Moral-Muñoz, José A., Enrique Herrera-Viedma, Antonio Santisteban-Espejo, and Manuel J. Cobo. 2020. “Software Tools for Conducting Bibliometric Analysis in Science: An up-to-Date Review.” El Profesional de La Información 29 (1). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03.
Orlikowski, Wanda J., and Susan V. Scott. 2023. “The Digital Undertow and Institutional Displacement: A Sociomaterial Approach.” Organization Theory 4 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877231180898
Pedersen, Jesper Strandgaard, and Frank Dobbin. 2006. “In Search of Identity and Legitimation: Bridging Organizational Culture and Neoinstitutionalism.” The American Behavioral Scientist 49 (7): 897–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205284798.
Piffer, Vanessa, Flávio de São Pedro Filho, Leonardo Severo da Luz Neto, and Luiz Carlos Cavalcanti de Albuquerque. 2019. “Instrumental Character of the Concept of Sustainability Focusing to the Institutionalist Theory.” International Journal for Innovation Education and Research 7 (2): 104–23. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol7.iss2.1329.
Schoon, Eric W. 2022. “Operationalizing Legitimacy.” American Sociological Review 87 (3): 478–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224221081379.
Skačkauskienė, Iiona. 2022. Research on Management Theory: A Development Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Problems and Perspectives in Management. 20(2), 335-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(2).2022.28
Smith, Wendy K., and Paul Tracey. 2016. “Institutional Complexity and Paradox Theory: Complementarities of Competing Demands.” Strategic Organization 14 (4): 455–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016638565.
Steinhauser, Vivian, Angela Da Rocha, and Fábio De Oliveira Paula. 2022. “Institutional Theory and International Entrepreneurship: A Review.” Internext 17 (2): 264–83. https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v17i2.684.
Tolbert, Pamela S., and Lynne G. Zucker. 1999. “The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory. Studying Organization.” Theory & Method 1: 169–84.
Van Den Meerssche, Dimitri, and Geoff Gordon. 2020. “‘A New Normative Architecture’ - Risk and Resilience as Routines of Un-Governance.” Transnational Legal Theory 11(3): 267–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2020.1825036
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Zulkiffly Baharom, Khairul Hafezad Abdullah
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Esta revista oferece acesso livre imediato ao seu conteúdo, seguindo o princípio de que disponibilizar gratuitamente o conhecimento científico ao público proporciona maior democratização mundial do conhecimento.
A partir da publicação realizada na revista os autores possuem copyright e direitos de publicação de seus artigos sem restrições.
A Revista Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science segue os preceitos legais da licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
