Effect of luting agent on the bond strength of ceramic-based lithium disilicate and titanium abutment subjected to artificial aging

Washington Reis Leite, Paulo Henrique De Souza Pereira, Laís Regiane Da Silva Concílio

Resumo


This study aimed to evaluate the bond strength (BS) of a ceramic coping-abutment implant interface according to the luting agent, before and after thermal cycling (TC). Methodology: Forty ceramic copings and abutments (Ti) were divided into four groups (n=10): OZ (zinc oxide eugenol free), PZ (zinc phosphate), GIC (resin modified glass ionomer), and RC (adhesive resin cement). BS test was performed using a universal testing machine before and after TC. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test (p<0.05) were performed for the means. Results: The results showed that before TC, the values ranged from 50.77 N (OZ) to 240.21 N (GIC). After TC, the values showed intermediate results - 3.5 N (OZ) and 330.66 N (RC), 90.58 N (PZ), and 280.43 N (GIC). OZ performed the worst, both before and after TC. Before TC, GIC had the highest value. After TC, RC had the highest value of BS. Conclusions: The aging process influenced and inverted the results of the GIC and RC groups, and had a greater negative impact on the OZ group.

Palavras-chave


Luting agent; Bond; Lithium disilicate; Artificial aging

Texto completo:

PDF

Referências


Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Lindén U, Bergström

C, et al. Survival of the Brånemark implant in partially

edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J

Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:639-645.

Scholander S. A retrospective evaluation of 259 single-tooth

replacements by the use of Brånemark implants. Int J Prosthodont

;12:483-491.

Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study

of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous

jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416.

Brånemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindström J,

Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prosthese I. Experimental

studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100.

Chee W, Jivraj S. Screw versus cemented implant supported

restorations. Br Dent J 2006;20:501-507.

Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained

implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics

in implant dentistry.J Prosthet Dent 19970;77:28-35.

Ramp MH, Dixon DL, Ramp LC, Breeding LC, Barber LL. Tensile

bond strengths of provisional luting agents used with an

implant system.J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:510-514.

Covey DA, Kent DK, Junior HASG, Koka S. Effects of abutment

size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of

implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83:344-48.

Akça K, Iplikçioğlu H, Cehreli MC. Comparison of uniaxial

resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported

crowns. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:536-542.

Assif D, Marshak B, Horowitz A. Analysis of load transfer

and stress distribution by an implant-supported fixed partial

denture. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:285-591.

Rodrigues Filho LE, Burger LA, Kenshima S, Bauer JR, Medeiros

IS, Muench A. Effect of light-activation methods and

water storage on the bonding to densely sintered zirconiumoxide

ceramic. Dental Materials 2009;25:172-173.

Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Aguilera FS, Yamauti M,

Pashley DH, et al. Durability of resin-dentin bonds: effects of

direct/indirect exposure and storage media. Dent Mater 2007;

:885-92.

Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Bogacki MT, Tietge JD. Use of luting

agents with an implant system: Part I. J Prosthet Dent

;68:737-741.

Ekfeldt A, Carlsson GE, Börjesson G. Clinical evaluation of

single-tooth restorations supported by osseointegrated implants:

a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants

;9:179-183.

White SN, Yu Z, Tom JF, Sangsurasak S. In vivo marginal

adaptation of cast crowns luted with different cements. J Prosthet

Dent 1995;74:25-32.

Levine RA, Clem DS 3rd, Wilson TG Jr, Higginbottom F,

Saunders SL. A multicenter retrospective analysis of the ITI

implant system used for single-tooth replcements: preliminary

results at 6 or more months of loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac

Implants 1997;12:237-242.

Moberg LE, Köndell PA, Kullman L, Heimdahl A, Gynther

GW. Evaluation of single-tooth restorations on ITI dental implants.

A prospective study of 29 patients. Clin Oral Implants

Res 1999;10:45-53.

Scacchi M. The development of the ITI Dental Implant System.

Part 1: a review of the literature. Clin Oral Implants Res

;11:8-21.

Leite et al./ Sci Invest Dent 2017; 22(1):7-13.

Scacchi M, Merz BR, Schär AR. The development of the ITI

Dental Implant System. Part 2: 1998-2000: Steps into the next

millennium. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:22-32.

Squier RS, Agar JR, Duncan JP, Taylor TD. Retentiveness of

dental cements used with metallic implant components. Int J

Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:793-798.

Khraisat A, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Fatigue

resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs. J Prosthet

Dent 2002;88:604-610.

Levine RA, Clem D, Beagle J, Ganeles J, Johnson P, Solnit

G, et al. Multicenter retrospective analysis of the solid-screw

ITI implant for posterior single-tooth replacements., Int J Oral

Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:550-556.

Mansour A, Ercoli C, Graser G, Tallents R, Moss M. Comparative

evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment

with six cements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002 ;13:343-

Vigolo P, Givani A, Mayzoub Z, Condioli G. Cemented versus

screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a

-year prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants

;19:260-265.

Cortellini D, Valenti M, Canale A. The metal-free approach

to restorative treatment planning. Eur J Esthet Dent

;1:230-247.

Pan YH, Ramp LC, Lin CK, Liu PR. Comparison of 7 luting

protocols and their effect on the retention and marginal leakage

of a cement-retained dental implant restoration. Int J Oral

Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:587-592.

Emms M, Tredwin CJ, Setchell DJ, Moles DR. The effects of

abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel

filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained,

implant-supported restorations. J Prosthodont 2007;16:3-

Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Traini T, Di lorio D, Caputi S. Fracture

resistance of implant-supported screw- versus cement-retained

porcelain fused to metal single crowns: SEM fractographic

analysis. Dent Mater 2007;23:296-301.

Abbo B, Razzoog ME, Vivas J, Sierraalta M. Resistance to

dislodgement of zirconia copings cemented onto titanium

abutments of different heights. J Prosthet Dent 2008 ;99:25-29.

Christensen GJ. Three-unit fixed prostheses versus implant-

-supported single crowns. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:191-194.

Dudley JE, Richards LC, Abbott JR. Retention of cast

crown copings cemented to implant abutments. Aust Dent J

;53:332-339.

Mehl C, Harder S, Wolfart M, Kern M, Wolfart S. Retrievability

of implant-retained crowns following cementation. Clin

Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1304-1311.

Rappelli G, Corso M, Coccia E, Camaioni E, Di Felice R, Procaccini

M. In vitro retentive strength of metal superstructures

Valenti M, Valenti A. Retrospective survival analysis of 261

lithium disilicate crowns in a private general practice. Quintessence

Int 2009;40:573-579.

Wolfart S, Eschbach S, Scherrer S, Kern M. Clinical outcome

of three-unit lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic fixed dental prostheses:

up to 8 years results. Dent Mater 2009;25:63-71.

Fasbinder DJ. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM

restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;137:22S-31S.

Marshall SJ, Bayne SC, Baier R, Tomsia AP, Marshall GW. A

review of adhesion science., Dent Mater 2010;26:11-16.

Tarica DY, Alvarado VM, Truong ST. Survey of United States

dental schools on cementation protocols for implant crown

restorationse., J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:68-79.

Magne P, Magne M, Jovanic S. An esthetic solution for single

implant restoration – Type III porcelain veneer bonded to a

srew retain custom abutment: A clinical report. J Prosthet dent

; 99;2-7.

Anusavice KJ. In: Anusavice KJ, editor. Phillips’ science of

dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis: Saunders Co; 2003. p. 481-




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29232/2317-2835.2017v22i1.p7-13

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


Scientific Investigation in Dentistry

e-ISSN 2317-2835

  

Centro Universitário de Anápolis - UniEVANGÉLICA

Odontologia